Paul M. SammonRecensioni

Not a bad overview, includes some of the behind the scenes intrigue between Glenn Lord and L. Sprague de Camp (who's writing I deplored).

Relatively complete, though he seems to skip right over the Jason Momoa Conan movie, interestingly enough.

Filled with gorgeous art.

Original review 2013:

Read this a few years ago now and don't recall much other than I read it because "Blade Runner" is one of my favourite SF films, if not the most favourite, and I've also read the P K Dick original and several of his other books, though not for some years.

Re-read 2022

Just re-read this before passing the book to a charity shop as doing some downsizing of books. This did not alter my original 3-star rating because a) there is no index and that would be handy with the number of people being discussed who were involved in the film; b) although there is a list of film credits in an appendix, it doesn't help with the number of other people who are name checked and who didn't actually work on the film, for instance, the film backers, and it is sometimes hard to recall who someone is when they are reintroduced later; c) the black and white photos in the text are small and dark so it isn't easy to make out detail in most of them; d) points in the plot I've always wondered about are not addressed.

An example of the last issue is in the scene where Pris fights Deckard and could have broken his neck but then releases him and gives him the perfect opportunity to shoot her. The author does slightly skate around the thread of misogyny in the film - Deckard only kills women and at one point - haven't seen it for years but the author does cover it in the chapter doing a scene by scene breakdown - assaults Rachael although he supposedly "loves" her - but he backs away from the subject. I love the film but it does have this disquieting aspect.

Positive points about the book are the light shed on the film making process, the many compromises made, committee nature of script production (and how this leads to continuity errors with the script going through multiple drafts by multiple people), pressures from the various financial backers involved and the possibility of on-set tensions and misunderstandings. It's amazing that films are made despite all this and are even as good as Blade Runner.

I skipped past the interviews at the end as well as some of the info on the newer versions of the film. It's a pretty interesting book but there were some really weird glaring mistakes, like the fact Sammon comments on how Man in the High Castle was a smash hit on Netflix? Book does give you a good respect for all that goes into making a movie

One of the few good reference books written on the Sullen Northman. With this book we get to see the many aspects and personalities that multiple writers have given us for our hero. Publication history and lots of good meaty things to slice into. Reminds us that Conan is not just a character that Arnold portrayed. But instead a conflicted and brooding man who knows his destiny but constantly clashes with it. Much more than a big guy wearing a loin cloth in a much bigger world than we ever thought.

Blade Runner is very much a movie that people either love or hate. Some consider it one of the greatest science fiction films ever made, and others find it to be a boring and confusing slog with pretty visuals. I'm definitely of the former sentiment. Blade Runner fans love the film obsessively. Paul Sammon's book is basically everything a fan would ever want to know about the making of the film.

Technically the third edition of the book, Sammon has done further research and cleared up some long-standing misconceptions about the film's infamously troubled production. The revised version also contains some information on the (then upcoming) sequel, Blade Runner 2049.

While the book is substantial, I found Sammon's writing to be clear and very quick and easy to read. The details are well laid out and you're given plenty of insight into how the film came to be from Philip K. Dick's original novel, "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?" The production was difficult, the critical response was lackluster, and the film has seen multiple changes and incarnations since it first hit theaters in 1982. Thankfully, since 2007, we now have the Final Cut of the film, as well as any of the other versions you may prefer. A good read for a film history buff.½

This is an amazingly detailed book, it goes through everything related to Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep/Blade Runner. A combination of the first two editions Sammon has at one time or another had access to a number people involved from Phillip K. Dick to Harrison Ford which leads to some impressive coverage from page to studio, to filming, to editing, and to fan reaction.

Free review copy.

Amazingly exhaustive and comprehensive behind the scenes look at one of the most influential movies ever made. A must read for fans and film buffs alike.

Often a bit much. I guess I prefer my horror with more aesthetic style and less abuse... some of the stories weren't bad though - some good authors featured. I probably would have liked the book as a whole better if the editor weren't so keen on defining and validating the term "splatterpunk" at every given opportunity.

L'ouvrage définitif sur le film Blade Runner. Paul Sammon a interviewé tout le monde, tout recherché, etc. On y a apprend l'histoire exceptionnelle de ce film exceptionnel, et on est pas déçus : guéguerres puériles sur le plateau, grèves, réalisations incroyables des équipes...

Paul Sammon ne néglige rien, pas même l'encyclopédie des trouzaines de BO pirates du film (parfois bien bien meilleures que l'officielle), même si ce catalogue n'est, évidemment, pas à jour ;)

Bref, l'ouvrage à lire indispensable pour tout amateur de Blade Runner qui se respecte.½

This book was ok. Certainly nothing to write home about. There were some interviews & other essays that I don't feel really went with the stories. They may have been ok with more of the same but they didn't work mixed in with the fiction. I bought it used and certainly don't feel an overwhelming need to go out & find the first one. Probably the best thing about it was it was a pretty fast read.

Paul M. Sammon has collected some of the most extreme horror available on the market and compiled it into this gem of an anthology. This book is not for everyone. The subject matter is well beyond societal norms and should not be read by those who find taboo material offensive. If am describing you, read something else. Those willing to tow the line of decency with me, read on...

Splatterpunks is comprised of 17 short-stories and an essay by the author on the splatterpunk genre as a whole. My favorites of the collection include: Clive Barker's "Midnight Meat Train" - story of a killer feeding off of the New York underground, John Skipp's "Film at Eleven" the story of a battered wife who has led a battered life and once she plots her revenge, things do not go as planned and Edward Bryant's "While She Was Out" - A woman is attacked by four men in a parking lot at Christmas; revenge ensues.

Some of the stories are a bit weak at times, but all in all this is a great collection from this subset of the horror genre.

"Blade Runner" went through so many incarnations and has such a complicated history, and Sammon does a great job of telling its story. This book is really engaging, with a POV that's Just Fannish Enough. (Although Sammon's totally wrong about the Director's Cut being better than the International Cut. Narration rules!) It's a shame that Ridley Scott comes off as totally batshit insane in the interview at the end of the book. ("Deckard's a Replicant...and he's immortal!")

All about the film Blade Runner