Pascal Engel
Autore di A cosa serve la verità?
Sull'Autore
Opere di Pascal Engel
La dispute: Une introduction a la philosophie analytique (Paradoxe) (French Edition) (1997) 10 copie
Y a- il des degrés de vérité ? 1 copia
LE POSITIVISME ET LA PSYCHOLOGIE 1 copia
LA VERITE MALGRE TOUT 1 copia
LA VALEUR DE VERITE 1 copia
L’institution du langage 1 copia
RETOUR AVAL 1 copia
PHILOSOPHIE DE LA PENSEE LOGICO-MATHÉMATIQUE: Logique, raisonnement et normes de rationalité 1 copia
HERMENEUTIQUE, LANGAGE ET VERITE 1 copia
E NTRETIEN DE PASCAL ENGEL AVEC L IONEL FOURE ET CLAUDE OBADIA L E PHILOSOPHOIRE , La Raison n°28 1 copia
NORMES LOGIQUES ET EVOLUTION 1 copia
Opere correlate
Etichette
Informazioni generali
- Data di nascita
- 1954
- Sesso
- male
- Nazionalità
- France
- Attività lavorative
- Philosopher
Professor of Philosophy - Organizzazioni
- Sorbonne
University of Geneva
Institut Nicod
Utenti
Recensioni
Potrebbero anche piacerti
Autori correlati
Statistiche
- Opere
- 59
- Opere correlate
- 3
- Utenti
- 266
- Popolarità
- #86,736
- Voto
- 3.8
- Recensioni
- 1
- ISBN
- 46
- Lingue
- 4
Like Rorty, I have trouble seeing any way round objections to the correspondence theory of truth, so I'm firmly in his camp (wacky though it may seem): There's no correspondence between sentences and reality, the marginal utility of a statement being "true" (and not just "useful") is minimal and we should instead satisfy ourselves for descriptions of the world we find to be useful without caring how, whether or why they map onto some intangible external thing called reality.
Engel's arguments strike me as technical and implausible, since his first move is to surrender a large part of the ground by conceding there are real problems with correspondence - I doubt I do him justice, but he's reduced to saying things like 'correspondence or no, we *do* talk in terms which assume there is such a truth, and that mode of discourse in itself has some essential value and meaning which would be lost were we to relegate ourselves to merely finding sentences useful'.
I'm not persuaded, and Rorty's brilliant writing elsewhere (especially Philosophy and Social Hope and Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity) heaps grist to his wacky gallic mill.
Lastly, this book is short - it's about an hour's read, partly comprises a book review by Rorty of Engel's book on truth which is available online, and the copy I purchased was absurdly expensive.
One day the world may be turned on to (the recently deceased) Richard Rorty, but this isn't the book to do it.… (altro)