Immagine dell'autore.

Georges Charpak (1924–2010)

Autore di Debunked! ESP, Telekinesis, and Other Pseudoscience

13 opere 241 membri 6 recensioni

Sull'Autore

Georges Charpak is a member of the French Academie des Sciences & of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences. He has long worked at the European Center for Particle Physics (CERN) in Geneva. He received the 1992 Nobel Prize in physics for his invention of electronic detectors of ionizing particles, mostra altro used widely in physics, industry, & biology. He lives in Paris, France, & in Geneva, Switzerland. (Bowker Author Biography) mostra meno

Comprende il nome: Charpak Georges

Opere di Georges Charpak

Etichette

Informazioni generali

Utenti

Recensioni

> Voici un livre qui nous fait partager une conception éthique de l'usage des outils formidables qu'il a puissamment contribué à développer la qualité de la transmission du Savoir aux plus jeunes. La description du fonctionnement de la coopération des chercheurs du CERN (ayant par exemple abouti à la naissance de l'Internet) m'apparaît comme un trop rare exemple de la mise en évidence de la puissance d'une coopération internationale rigoureuse et exigeante.
Danieljean (Babelio)
… (altro)
 
Segnalato
Joop-le-philosophe | Feb 12, 2021 |
A very unique book explaining the probability of ESP and telekinesis, among other things and how the power of being vague is the true power in these types of belief systems.
 
Segnalato
LeeBoiBoi | 3 altre recensioni | Jul 17, 2019 |
A book about pseudoscience, explaining the fallacies that keep pseudoscience thriving. A thin book, easy to read, but rather thin on substance. The authors breeze through some relatively simple topics without much depth of exploration; they spend little time on each topic, and there is little to promote critical thinking in general. In addition, they make some standard errors themselves, starting out in the prologue by perpetuating the fallacy that our brains are adapted to the savannah and there hasn't been any real evolution in human history after that. This is as unlikely as any of the propositions they so readily debunk. Also, there is some indication that there is a certain ideological bent to their thinking rather than necessarily a deep commitment to bringing critical thinking to bear on all ideas, so they avoid questioning those things they believe in. A rather disappointing work.… (altro)
 
Segnalato
Devil_llama | 3 altre recensioni | Dec 30, 2013 |

Potrebbero anche piacerti

Autori correlati

Statistiche

Opere
13
Utenti
241
Popolarità
#94,248
Voto
3.0
Recensioni
6
ISBN
36
Lingue
9

Grafici & Tabelle