A marvelous book for learning how to pitch your book! And a great how-to in writing query letters, synopses and outlines. Provides loads of examples ... even how to rewrite the bad ones. It's an easy read and one I've gone back to more than a few times.

Segnalato

jakohnen | 4 altre recensioni | Sep 13, 2018 |

Give 'Em What They Want: The Right Way to Pitch Your… di Marshalll J. Cook

Was written in 2005. Mostly seems like helpful advice, though some is outdated (sending queries as professional letters in snail mail, instead of quick blurbs in email).

It would be nice to see an agent's view of this book, or how their view of this book has changed in the last six years.

I underlined plenty in this book, and intend to check out websites I don't already have saved.

Segnalato

AprilBrown | 4 altre recensioni | Feb 25, 2015 |

Give 'Em What They Want: The Right Way to Pitch Your… di Blythe Camenson

I died a little bit inside when I read this book. Yes, I should know better. When I write about self-publishing, the recurrent theme is that “publishing is a business.” And the goal of a business is to make money. (With a few exceptions, those being a selection of small presses that look to break even in order to present artistically valuable, non-commerical work.) The big however is that being an artist is not a business. Being an artist is about creating something new, a form, whether it be on stage, on the written page, or on a canvas. Then, once you’ve poured your heart into a work, you need to decide whether it’s publishable or salable, and if so to whom and how.

The problem with this book is that it never acknowledges the artist. By contrast, I recommend a book that covers the exact same strategies and advice as this one, but presents it in a way that understands the struggles of the writer. Read my review of The Sell Your Novel Tool Kit by Elizabeth Lyon for a more humane and broader examination of the process of finding an agent or publisher.

Even the title “Give ‘Em What They Want” makes me rather ill. How about, no, “Create What You Want and If They Don’t Like It Then Screw ‘Em, Do It Yourself.” I’m not being completely fair because for most writers the goal is to get published. Even so, the question becomes, how can you be true to your artistic aspirations and the commercial needs of a publishing house? What is a matter of integrity and what is a matter of respectable editing? Each writer needs to decide within their own conscience and by their own goals what is important to them. But this book acts like the be-all, end-all goal is to be published at all costs.

Here's a story from this book:

Robert Walker…was nearly crushed when the synopsis for a book to be called Downfall got rejected. So he telephoned the editor and asked why he’d been turned down (something we usually advise against doing).
“Two reasons,” he remembers her replying. “We’re doing long books now, not short. Our novels have to be at least 80,000 words, and that leaves Downfall 20,000 words short....[and:] we’re full up on mysteries right now. What we really need is more horror scripts.”
“All right. Give me a contract, and I’ll add 20,000 words and put in a monster.”
She agreed, and Walker had a sale. That’s flexibility.”

And that made me throw up a little in my mouth.

Some straightforward, decent tips in here for writing query letters, but I much preferred the presentation by Elizabeth Lyon.

… (altro)

Segnalato

David_David_Katzman | 4 altre recensioni | Nov 26, 2013 |

Vedi altre recensioni