Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.
Sto caricando le informazioni... Breathless Homicidal Slime Mutants: The Art of the Paperback (2010)di Steven Brower
Nessuno Sto caricando le informazioni...
Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro. Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro. The title caught my attention. As a librarian I am interested in all types of books. As an art lover the covers of books have always drawn my attention. As a reader, I tend to drift to popular mass-market paperbacks rather than classic literature. The book has a very detailed history for publishing in general and the business of mass-market paperbacks specifically. I scanned the text for interesting points but spent most of my time with the book looking at the large array of paperback cover reproductions. Probably more for book lovers and librarians than the general public. As the digital age inexorably marches forward, threatening to put the printed word out of print, Breathless Homicidal Slime Mutants is a complete and unabridged argument for why the mass-market paperback must be preserved. -- Book Jacket Hardcover books looked more imposing; mass-market paperbacks looked more informal. Hardcover jackets were more artful; paperback covers were more commercial. Hardcover graphics were more nuanced; paperback covers titillated by leaving little to the imagination. Hardcover graphics merely suggested the content; paperback covers pounded the plot and/or characters home. …most paperbacks were realistically, romantically, or surrealistically illustrated. (p11) nessuna recensione | aggiungi una recensione
A visually dynamic homage to the paperback. In 1968, John Leonard, then editor of The New York Times Book Review, listed the many merits of mass-market paperbacks: "They can be stuffed in purses, left in buses, dropped in toilets, used as coasters, eaten and thrown away. Their covers can be ripped off! Their spines can be broken! To buy a paperback today is to buy the means of revenging oneself on Western culture." Fast-forward forty years. Leonard's affectionately flippant assessment may need to be revised as the explosion of digital media threatens the livelihood of the printed word. More than an act of revenge on Western culture, to buy a paperback may be a means of preserving one of its more charismatic--and socially, politically, and aesthetically influential--species. Breathless Homicidal Slime Mutants celebrates the mass-market paperback and gives it its due. A vibrant tour that starts with books from the late nineteenth century up to today, examining the most popular genres--mystery, romance, Westerns, how-to, cooking, and diet, and highbrow literature packaged for the broader audience--it focuses on the history of the art and design of the format and how it is inseparable from the history of American literacy, tastes, and mores of the twentieth century. Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche |
Discussioni correntiNessuno
Google Books — Sto caricando le informazioni... GeneriSistema Decimale Melvil (DDC)741.6The arts Graphic arts and decorative arts Drawing & drawings Graphic design, illustration, commercial artClassificazione LCVotoMedia:
Sei tu?Diventa un autore di LibraryThing. |
The contents were organized very strangely, by genre (from my admittedly faulty memory, the genres were regular, western, romance, sci-fi/fantasy, non-fiction, classic, and lesbian (seriously, it was singled out for its own incredibly tiny section)). Turns out that the reprints of classics had far-and-away the most interesting covers--I'm assuming that, free from the responsibility of hinting about contents (we might not know what a Dell mystery paperback might be about, but we should have a sense of what "Hamlet" contains), artists were able to go a little further out on the limb.
But it's all picture, picture, picture, with very little discussion or insight into what we're seeing, why, how it changes over time, etc. Slightly more than the others I've dived into recently, but not nearly enough.
(Note: 5 stars = amazing, wonderful, 4 = very good book, 3 = decent read, 2 = disappointing, 1 = awful, just awful. I'm fairly good at picking for myself so end up with a lot of 4s). I feel a lot of readers automatically render any book they enjoy 5, but I grade on a curve!
( )