Finished last week, didn't get a chance to log until today. Felt a little post-mortem (unsurprisingly) reading it now, though the author (a law professor focused on abortion law and conservatism) could see how the courts were moving. Ultimately, legal, social, and scientific reasons are bandied about when conservatives aimed to reduce choices. There's some outliers, like the AUL leader who was a progressive Catholic, but otherwise interesting how choice has been framed over the decades in the United States. ( )