Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.
Sto caricando le informazioni... Big Lies: The Right-Wing Propaganda Machine and How It Distorts the Truth (2003)di Joe Conason
Nessuno Sto caricando le informazioni...
Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro. Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro. A lot of the arguments aren’t so much here’s why the Democrats are better as throwing more dirt up about the Republicans’ many inadequacies. For instance, on the lie that Republicans are the party of family values, Conason trots out a litany of failed Republican marriages, Republican affairs, and Republican closeted gays. Rather than examine their policies and effect on families and compare it to the Democrats’ and how the latter is better. The defense of the Democrats is limited to noting that the Clintons’ marriage has lasted decades despite problems, and that they offer pro-family policies. But Conason never explains and compares those policies. Disappointing. (Full review at my blog) nessuna recensione | aggiungi una recensione
Menzioni
Presents a critical examination of smear tactics utilized by right-wing politicians, challenging such conceptions as Bush's conservative reputation and the detrimental economic impact of Democratic policies. Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche |
Discussioni correntiNessunoCopertine popolari
Google Books — Sto caricando le informazioni... GeneriSistema Decimale Melvil (DDC)973.931History and Geography North America United States 1901- Bush Administration And Beyond George W. BushClassificazione LCVotoMedia:
Sei tu?Diventa un autore di LibraryThing. |
but I think he is one of those political columnists. Apparently one that
isn't carried by any newspaper I ever read. LOL The title of the book is
what attracted me to it.
Since I tend to be more liberal than conservative, I figured I'd enjoy this
book and I did. I wish he'd have included his sources for the statements he makes. This book doesn't include footnotes or sources so it
would not be very useful as a reference, but I liked the way this guy
writes. I lived through most of what he was talking about anyway, and know
he's right for the most part. It made for interesting reading for me. I'll
give it a 4. ( )