Pagina principaleGruppiConversazioniAltroStatistiche
Cerca nel Sito
Questo sito utilizza i cookies per fornire i nostri servizi, per migliorare le prestazioni, per analisi, e (per gli utenti che accedono senza fare login) per la pubblicità. Usando LibraryThing confermi di aver letto e capito le nostre condizioni di servizio e la politica sulla privacy. Il tuo uso del sito e dei servizi è soggetto a tali politiche e condizioni.

Risultati da Google Ricerca Libri

Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.

Sto caricando le informazioni...

Who's to Say?: A Dialogue on Relativism

di Norman Melchert

UtentiRecensioniPopolaritàMedia votiCitazioni
781343,562 (2.8)1
Arguments are examined, reexamined, challenged, and honed in this lively dialogue on relativism and objectivity. Topics considered include whether truth and goodness are matters determined by individual opinion; whether they are defined by cultures; whether a non-dogmatic form of relativism is viable; whether the objectivity of science escapes relativism; and pragmatism as an alternative to relativism. Designed to present beginning students with an introduction to the main arguments concerning relativism, this provocative dialogue also serves as a model for thinking clearly about philosophical issues.… (altro)
Nessuno
Sto caricando le informazioni...

Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro.

Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro.

» Vedi 1 citazione

This is a short primer about relativism, both epistemic and moral. It is an excellent and accessible overview of the various arguments for and against objectivism, realism, individualistic relativism, cultural relativism, and extreme postmodern relativism. It doesn't go into great depth into any of them, which is why I gave it four stars instead of five. But it presents the positions well in a dialog format. (The scenario is a conversation between six old college friends.)

Here are some quotes from the end of this short (84 pages) book:


"Think about the line, 'custom is king over all.' Taken one way it just says human beings live very diverse lives and believe very different things. And that is certainly true, but neither very exciting nor profound.

"But that sense slides into others which amount to a kind of counsel of despair. So we find ourselves saying that there's no telling what's really good or true. That maybe the notions of 'absolutely good' or 'objectively true' don't even make sense—that all we have are opinions anyway. So who's to say? Maybe one opinion is as good as another. It all comes down to personal preference in the end anyway. And in the end we are left with that miserable concept 'true-for-me.'

"But think how it originates. I hear it from my students when they are being pressed hard in argument. they try to escape this way and that, but nothing works. And finally they take refuge in 'Well, anyway, it's true for me!'

"I don't want to be too hard on them; they are still young. But they could admin defeat—say they were mistaken and have now learned something. Or they could say, 'I don't see how to answer that right now; let me think about it and I'll get back to you.' Or they could just admit their ignorance. But 'true-for-me' is the perfect defensive maneuver. It allows us to keep whatever belief we are fond of in a completely secure way. How could anyone show me that something I believe sincerely isn't true for me? Climbing back into that hole, I am completely safe.

"Besides, there is something dishonest about the phrase. It's kind of a cowardly move. To venture out in public with what you think is true takes courage. You expose yourself. Not just your beliefs, but yourself, since you are the one who has accepted these beliefs. And that's scary.

"But Socrates said we shouldn't be afraid to do that; we shouldn't be afraid to be shown wrong. He even said it is a great benefit to us if someone shows us we are mistaken, since having false opinions is an evil we should wish to be without."

"Questions about the good life are not ones we can shrug off. They do get answered one way or another. And if we don't do our best to answer them well, the lazy, the wicked, and the self-interested will answer them for us."

( )
  FluidMindOrg | Jun 14, 2016 |
nessuna recensione | aggiungi una recensione
Devi effettuare l'accesso per contribuire alle Informazioni generali.
Per maggiori spiegazioni, vedi la pagina di aiuto delle informazioni generali.
Titolo canonico
Titolo originale
Titoli alternativi
Data della prima edizione
Personaggi
Luoghi significativi
Eventi significativi
Film correlati
Epigrafe
Dedica
Incipit
Citazioni
Ultime parole
Nota di disambiguazione
Redattore editoriale
Elogi
Lingua originale
DDC/MDS Canonico
LCC canonico

Risorse esterne che parlano di questo libro

Wikipedia in inglese (1)

Arguments are examined, reexamined, challenged, and honed in this lively dialogue on relativism and objectivity. Topics considered include whether truth and goodness are matters determined by individual opinion; whether they are defined by cultures; whether a non-dogmatic form of relativism is viable; whether the objectivity of science escapes relativism; and pragmatism as an alternative to relativism. Designed to present beginning students with an introduction to the main arguments concerning relativism, this provocative dialogue also serves as a model for thinking clearly about philosophical issues.

Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche

Descrizione del libro
Riassunto haiku

Discussioni correnti

Nessuno

Copertine popolari

Link rapidi

Voto

Media: (2.8)
0.5 1
1 1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4 2
4.5 1
5

Sei tu?

Diventa un autore di LibraryThing.

 

A proposito di | Contatto | LibraryThing.com | Privacy/Condizioni d'uso | Guida/FAQ | Blog | Negozio | APIs | TinyCat | Biblioteche di personaggi celebri | Recensori in anteprima | Informazioni generali | 205,115,489 libri! | Barra superiore: Sempre visibile