Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.
Sto caricando le informazioni... Believers: Faith in Human Naturedi Melvin Konner M.D.
Nessuno Sto caricando le informazioni...
Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro. Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro. “I want to understand faith—its basis in brain function and genes, its growth in childhood, its deep evolutionary background, its countless cultural and historical varieties, its ties to morality, and its many roles in human life . . .” Konner has a background in medicine, anthropology, and neuroscience. Raised as an Orthodox Jew, at the age of seventeen, he lost his faith but has retained a lifelong interest in the religious impulse. Technically an atheist, he’s not a strident one and differs from the well-known “Quartet” of uncompromising non-believers: Dawkins, Dennett, Harris, and Hitchens. Konner asserts that humans are not rational beings, that they’re more or less hardwired for religion, and that religion can be a force for good. Noting that even though fewer and fewer people in the developed world identify themselves as believers (statistics show that with material progress religiosity decreases), Konner is nevertheless convinced that religion will persist in a large minority, perhaps (in some form) in a majority. In his book (whose first three long chapters I read) he promises a scientific look at the evolution and history of faith, interspersed with elements of memoir—personal stories of religious and irreligious encounters. In the few chapters I read, I became impatient with the author’s long-windedness. I also questioned some of his authorial choices. Instead of getting to the point, he likes to meander. For example, he states that as a college freshman he took a course in analytic philosophy that shook the belief out of him. However, the details he provides about this transformation seem extraneous rather than pertinent and supportive. We read about his inattentiveness in class and near failure of the course, and we wade through several abstruse quotations about “being” from the likes of Jean-Paul Sartre. How these details related to his loss of faith was beyond me. What I do know is that I was quickly losing confidence in him as a guide and dreading further (dull) “personal stories” of this kind. It’s very possible that I didn’t give this book enough of a chance. The subject matter interests me, but I wanted sharper, cleaner writing. I felt I was going to be travelling a long and winding road that led mostly to frustration. nessuna recensione | aggiungi una recensione
"An anthropologist examines the nature of religiosity, and how it shapes and benefits humankind. Believers is a scientist's answer to attacks on faith by some well-meaning scientists and philosophers-- a firm rebuke of the "Four Horsemen": Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris, and Christopher Hitchens, known for writing about religion as something irrational and ultimately harmful. Konner, who was raised as an Orthodox Jew but has lived his adult life without such faith, explores the psychology, development, brain science, evolution, and even genetics of the varied religious impulses we as a species experience. Conceding that faith is not for everyone, he views religious people with a sympathetic eye; his own upbringing, his apprenticeship in the trancedance religion of the African Bushmen, and his friends in Christian, Buddhist, Hindu, Muslim, and other faiths have all shaped his perspective. He concludes that religion does much good as well as undoubted harm, and that for at least a large minority of humanity, the belief in things unseen neither can nor should go away"-- Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche |
Discussioni correntiNessuno
Google Books — Sto caricando le informazioni... GeneriSistema Decimale Melvil (DDC)306.6Social sciences Social Sciences; Sociology and anthropology Culture and Institutions Religious institutionsClassificazione LCVotoMedia:
Sei tu?Diventa un autore di LibraryThing. |
What is meant by "faith"? Do any animals exhibit "awe"? Can we map in the human brain what is going on with belief or religious experience? What about those magic mushrooms? Does goodness require religion? And if not God, then what? All thoughtfully explored, discussed, and questioned.
Fear not, believers. Konner is kind. He mentions "losing his faith" (he was raised in an Orthodox Jewish household) as a teenager, but he doesn't really explain what that means. (The magician Penn Jillette is more specific: he distinguishes between not believing in God and believing that there is no God.) He also felt it was important to raise his kids as Jews (with a non-believing spouse). He is sometimes critical of the Quartet for their disparagement of believers for willful ignorance, or foolish acceptance of what they deem to be fairy tales at best, and outright lies at worst. He tries hard, but the chapter on the neurology of faith, with a lot of talk about A1 receptors, left and right caudate nuclei, etc. is tough going. He is very respectful of the value hospital chaplains bring to suffering patients. And his present wife is a believing Presbyterian, so perhaps that has softened him a bit more.
All told, believers and non-believers will find something to illuminate the purpose religous faith might serve among humans. While unlikely to change anyone's mind - and that doesn't seem to be his intent in any case - Konner paints a useful picture of the possible origins of religion, and why (some) people need it. ( )