![](https://image.librarything.com/pics/fugue21/magnifier-left.png)
![](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/P/0809519062.01._SX180_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg)
Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.
Sto caricando le informazioni... Yesterday's Bestsellers: A Journey Through Literary Historydi Brian M. Stableford
Nessuno Sto caricando le informazioni...
![]() Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro. Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro. nessuna recensione | aggiungi una recensione
Appartiene alle Collane Editoriali
A study of the popluar fiction of the past. Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche |
Discussioni correntiNessuno
![]() VotoMedia:![]()
Sei tu?Diventa un autore di LibraryThing. |
I stumbled upon this book while in search of a contemporary review of The Garden of Allah by Robert Hichens. This is by no means contemporary, but it does present some interesting background about Hichens and his writing. If I had read this review before reading Hichens' book itself, I might have decided to skip it.
The most familiar books and writers covered here include Robinson Crusoe and its descendants, Alice in Wonderland and its back story, Lost Horizon by James Hilton, I, Claudius and Raymond Chandler and the American crime novel and its film noir derivatives.
Stableford is British and except for Eugene Sue (French) and Raymond Chandler (American), all the writers discussed were British. Some are almost forgotten today: H. Rider Haggard (She), Marie Corelli (A Romance of Two Worlds), Robert Hichens (The Garden of Allah), Edward Bulwar-Lytton (The Last Days of Pompeii), Eugene Sue (The Mysteries of Paris, P.C. Wren (Beau Geste), James Hadley Chase (No Orchids for Miss Blandish) and Hank Janson. Stableford does a good job of placing the books in context. He has interesting things to say about the authors and contemporary world events.
A word about this edition. It is available inexpensively through Google Books. I read it on line, which was fine, but unfortunately, there is no facility for highlighting passages. This is almost like torture for a compulsive underliner like me! One can preview the book at Google, if interested.
The criticism altogether was well done, but I kept wondering why the writer didn't select more books that were attractive. Not that he exactly panned Robinson Crusoe, Alice in Wonderland, I Claudius, etc., completely, but the overall effect of this book, particularly the last few chapters, left an unpleasant taste in my mouth. I didn't come away with the feeling that I needed to rush out and catch up with many of these authors. (