Pagina principaleGruppiConversazioniAltroStatistiche
Cerca nel Sito
Questo sito utilizza i cookies per fornire i nostri servizi, per migliorare le prestazioni, per analisi, e (per gli utenti che accedono senza fare login) per la pubblicità. Usando LibraryThing confermi di aver letto e capito le nostre condizioni di servizio e la politica sulla privacy. Il tuo uso del sito e dei servizi è soggetto a tali politiche e condizioni.

Risultati da Google Ricerca Libri

Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.

Sto caricando le informazioni...

Watchdogs of Democracy?: The Waning Washington Press Corps and How It Has Failed the Public

di Helen Thomas

Altri autori: Vedi la sezione altri autori.

UtentiRecensioniPopolaritàMedia votiCitazioni
1627168,620 (3.39)6
In the course of more than sixty years spent covering Washington politics, Helen Thomas has witnessed a raft of fundamental changes in the way news is gathered and reported. Gone are the days of frequent firsthand contact with the president. Now, the press sees the president only at tightly controlled and orchestrated press conferences. In addition, Thomas sees a growing -- and alarming -- reluctance among reporters to question government spokesmen and probe for the truth. The result has been a wholesale failure by journalists to fulfill what is arguably their most vital role in contemporary American life -- to be the watchdogs of democracy. Today's journalists, according to Thomas, have become subdued, compromised lapdogs. Here, the legendary journalist and bestselling author delivers a hard-hitting manifesto on the precipitous decline in the quality and ethics of political reportage -- and issues a clarion call for change. Thomas confronts some of the most significant issues of the day, including the jailing of reporters, the conservative swing in television news coverage, and the administration's increased insistence on "managed" news. But she is most emphatic about reporters' failure to adequately question President George W. Bush and White House spokesmen about the lead-up to the invasion of Iraq, and on subjects ranging from homeland security to the economy. This, she insists, was a dire lapse. Drawing on her peerless knowledge of journalism, Washington politics, and nine presidential administrations, as well as frank interviews with leading journalists past and present, Thomas provides readers with a rich historical perspective on the roots of American journalism, the circumstances attending the rise and fall of its golden age, and the nature and consequences of its current shortcomings. The result is a powerful, eye-opening discourse on the state of political reportage -- as well as a welcome and inspiring demand for meaningful and lasting reform.… (altro)
Nessuno
Sto caricando le informazioni...

Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro.

Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro.

» Vedi le 6 citazioni

Watchdogs of Democracy? The Waning Washington Press Corps and How It Failed the Public, by Helen Thomas (pp 206). This Thomas’ book was published in 2006, it remains on point about shortcomings of the Washington Press Corps and news providers generally. Thomas is at her best telling stories about her White House days; extolling the virtues of reporters over the years, including many fine women; castigating those who compromised their objectivity for a variety of reasons (let alone being outright deceptive); discussing the role and history of newspapers and other media sources; and lamenting the proliferation of supposed news sources that are little more than purveyors of bias and opinion. The book suffers when she is self-congratulatory for many of her successes or her access to the powerful, but luckily that is quite limited. Oddly, in two chapters that cover the business of news—the lamentable need to make money, and a detailed explanation of the FCC regulatory authority and legal aspects of confidential sources and privilege—-the writing loses Helen’s voice, as if they were written by others. That may be partly true, in that she thanks her agent, a lawyer, for contributing to chapters about the First Amendment and the need for federal shield laws. Regardless, this very readable book about the essential but imperiled role of journalism in American society is insightful, educational, and alarming. It’s especially worth reading because of how we are inundated by information and opinion, little of which constitutes factual news. ( )
  wildh2o | Jul 10, 2021 |
I gave it two stars, but it is mostly because the book is a little on the dry side. It has some interesting things, but it can also bog down at times depending on the chapter. Her dislike of bloggers is very evident, which certainly did not make me like her any better; while debatable whether bloggers should be treated as journalists (some probably should), in her despise of them she comes across as someone who is just not with the times, which is kind of ironic given she is making an argument for reporters to keep up.

Her points about the press being pretty much complacent and lapdogs is significant, and it should cause concern for people. Clearly, the press has failed the public when it comes to covering the news in an objective and fair way. For history buffs, this is a pretty good book on the history of the press in the U.S. in the 20th century. So, overall, not bad, but not great either. ( )
  bloodravenlib | Aug 17, 2020 |
Great read. Helen Thomas definitely makes my list of people I'd love to invite to a dinner party. ( )
  KApplebaum | Jan 17, 2010 |
A chunk of this book is accolades to outstanding reporters and news peers of Thomas's, but most of it points out ways in which reporting has failed to be probing and questioning of authority, with a complete collapse of that function in the Bush years. Traces the history of how White House news has been increasingly managed and scripted over the last 4 or 5 decades, and how news has generally become more sanitized and shallow over that time. Troublesome food for thought, and a general wake-up call about asking hard questions and what it takes to be an informed public (or to inform the public). As a writer now dealing with news analysis I found this particularly helpful in thinking about the ethics and greater purpose of news-related writing ( )
  Teramis | Aug 24, 2009 |
I'm normally a big fan of Helen Thomas, but I found this book to be disappointing. It felt very disjointed to me, especially at the end, where the topics seemed to switch mid-paragraph.

It was a litany of good journalists in the past, and references to bad journalism of the present, without naming names. I was hoping for more blood. ( )
  craigim | Aug 29, 2007 |
nessuna recensione | aggiungi una recensione

» Aggiungi altri autori

Nome dell'autoreRuoloTipo di autoreOpera?Stato
Helen Thomasautore primariotutte le edizionicalcolato
Corral, RodrigoProgetto della copertinaautore secondarioalcune edizioniconfermato

Appartiene alle Collane Editoriali

Devi effettuare l'accesso per contribuire alle Informazioni generali.
Per maggiori spiegazioni, vedi la pagina di aiuto delle informazioni generali.
Titolo canonico
Titolo originale
Titoli alternativi
Data della prima edizione
Personaggi
Luoghi significativi
Eventi significativi
Film correlati
Epigrafe
Dedica
Incipit
Citazioni
Ultime parole
Nota di disambiguazione
Redattore editoriale
Elogi
Lingua originale
DDC/MDS Canonico
LCC canonico
In the course of more than sixty years spent covering Washington politics, Helen Thomas has witnessed a raft of fundamental changes in the way news is gathered and reported. Gone are the days of frequent firsthand contact with the president. Now, the press sees the president only at tightly controlled and orchestrated press conferences. In addition, Thomas sees a growing -- and alarming -- reluctance among reporters to question government spokesmen and probe for the truth. The result has been a wholesale failure by journalists to fulfill what is arguably their most vital role in contemporary American life -- to be the watchdogs of democracy. Today's journalists, according to Thomas, have become subdued, compromised lapdogs. Here, the legendary journalist and bestselling author delivers a hard-hitting manifesto on the precipitous decline in the quality and ethics of political reportage -- and issues a clarion call for change. Thomas confronts some of the most significant issues of the day, including the jailing of reporters, the conservative swing in television news coverage, and the administration's increased insistence on "managed" news. But she is most emphatic about reporters' failure to adequately question President George W. Bush and White House spokesmen about the lead-up to the invasion of Iraq, and on subjects ranging from homeland security to the economy. This, she insists, was a dire lapse. Drawing on her peerless knowledge of journalism, Washington politics, and nine presidential administrations, as well as frank interviews with leading journalists past and present, Thomas provides readers with a rich historical perspective on the roots of American journalism, the circumstances attending the rise and fall of its golden age, and the nature and consequences of its current shortcomings. The result is a powerful, eye-opening discourse on the state of political reportage -- as well as a welcome and inspiring demand for meaningful and lasting reform.

Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche

Descrizione del libro
Riassunto haiku

Discussioni correnti

Nessuno

Copertine popolari

Link rapidi

Voto

Media: (3.39)
0.5
1 1
1.5
2 3
2.5
3 6
3.5 1
4 4
4.5
5 4

Sei tu?

Diventa un autore di LibraryThing.

 

A proposito di | Contatto | LibraryThing.com | Privacy/Condizioni d'uso | Guida/FAQ | Blog | Negozio | APIs | TinyCat | Biblioteche di personaggi celebri | Recensori in anteprima | Informazioni generali | 204,920,081 libri! | Barra superiore: Sempre visibile