1K

ConversazioniBook Discussion : What Reamains of Heaven by C S Harris

Iscriviti a LibraryThing per pubblicare un messaggio.

1K

Questa conversazione è attualmente segnalata come "addormentata"—l'ultimo messaggio è più vecchio di 90 giorni. Puoi rianimarla postando una risposta.

1Andrew-theQM
Dic 1, 2019, 5:49 am

Any thoughts on the disagreement between Franklin and Bishop Prescott? Why would Franklin’s father be a traitor?

2bhabeck
Dic 1, 2019, 9:37 am

Franklin's father was Ben Franklin and, to a loyalist, would have been considered a traitor to the crown when the colonies declared their independence from England. However, I'm surprised that the Bishop would condemn William Franklin on the basis of what his father did, especially when William had been disinherited due to his support of the crown. The Bishop seems to have some stances that don't fit with his role as a clergyman.

3Carol420
Dic 1, 2019, 10:14 am

At that time all the colonist were considered traitors. It was wrong of the Bishop to hold William Franklin responsible for his father's actions but he was considered guilty by association. Seems a great many clergy have opinions that don't exactly seem very "holy".

4EadieB
Modificato: Dic 1, 2019, 11:22 am

Ben Franklin was a traitor to the British crown. He was in favor of breaking away from the crown.

5gaylebutz
Dic 1, 2019, 11:43 am

Agree with everyone. Prescott was unfairly judging William by what his father did. Unfortunate but pretty common.

6Sergeirocks
Dic 1, 2019, 4:11 pm

I don't know why the bishop would hold a grudge against the son.

7Olivermagnus
Modificato: Dic 1, 2019, 11:03 pm

I don't understand why the bishop would hold "the sins of the father" against the son. He was a little to sanctimonious in my opinion.