Ross Rosenberg
Autore di The Human Magnet Syndrome: Why We Love People Who Hurt Us
Sull'Autore
Ross A Rosenberg, M.Ed, LCPC, CADC, is a national expert in codependency, sex addiction, narcissism, borderline personality disorders, and the emerging field of emotional manipulation. Over his 25 year career in psychotherapy, Ross has specialized in the treatment of substance abuse, addictions and mostra altro codependency/co-addictions. He is the owner of Clinical Care Consultants, a counseling center in the northern suburbs of Chicago. mostra meno
Opere di Ross Rosenberg
Etichette
Informazioni generali
Non ci sono ancora dati nella Conoscenza comune per questo autore. Puoi aiutarci.
Utenti
Recensioni
Statistiche
- Opere
- 3
- Utenti
- 29
- Popolarità
- #460,290
- Voto
- 3.0
- Recensioni
- 2
- ISBN
- 4
'The Human Magnet Syndrome' is a full-dive read into the undeniable attraction between emotional manipulators and codependents. This book examines how a person becomes either manipulative or codependent, why they are then attracted to individuals that have the opposite dysfunctional traits, and how this polarized relationship endures -- unhappily ever-after.
Emotional manipulators are in a nutshell, self-preoccupied, egotistical and calculating individuals who demand praise and affection to compensate for repressed childhood trauma and/or abandoment. On the other side of the coin (or the other pole of the magnet) are the codependents: self-sacrificing, passive and emotionally-deprived individuals who also seek affection and attention, but obtain it through excessive giving that overrides their personal needs. Due to an upbringing in an environment where they had to conform and serve to feel any sense of love, codependents are unconsciously attracted to those who demand much of them and give little, feeling that eventually they can 'win over' the detached manipulator and inspire the love inside them that they imagine must exist.
Rosenberg's book's strong points lie in the mid-chapters. He introduces the "Continuum of Self Value" (CSV) spectrum, a 10 increment measure that rates one's level of valuing others vs. valuing themselves. At one far end of the scale is the codependent at -5, and at the opposite end is the narcissist, at +5. Rosenberg's theory states that people are naturally attracted to people with the opposite orientation, at the same degree of intensity. So, a -4 codependent is attracted to the -4 narcissist, resulting in a balanced (however dysfunctional) relationship. The complementary balance is what allows the relationship to survive its dysfunction. Rosenberg suggests that those falling within the range of -2 to +2 have a healthy level of CSV, able to interchange between pursuing their self-interests, and considering the needs of others. And they too, would be attracted to the opposite healthy equivalent. With this polarizing attraction theory, those that are opposite orientations but not at the same intensity will not attract. For example, a -5 full-blown codependent and a +2 individual with some self-absorption will not survive long-term, because the the +2 individual would eventually recognize that their -5 friend is behaving in an overly needy and insecure way. Unlike a +5 narcissist, they would not feel a desire to take advantage of that neediness, and may simply move on from the relationship.
Rosenberg goes on to elaborate on the diagnostic criteria and history of recognized psychiatric disorders which fall at different points of the above spectrum. There is great information here both about how the disorders come to exist, and what types of behaviors and thought patterns are part of each.
Where this book falls short (or could be shortened) is in areas where the author rambles on a little too long about his personal experience (mainly in the introductory chapters), and where he goes into tangents that are only mildly interesting, if not wholly distracting from the topic at hand (e.g. including a song's entire lyrics). Oftentimes too Rosenberg quotes sources that are hardly verifiable, such as wiki Answers, which only works to hurt the credibility of his work. When I first started reading the book, I found myself skimming over entire paragraphs when I got the sense it wasn't necessary to read. On the plus side, when it gets into the more psychology-focused material in the middle, there is a more constructive and succinct flow.
Overall, there are great nuggets of information to be extracted from this book, though it need not be read cover-to-cover. I personally like the CSV tool a lot, and by looking at the definitions of each level from -5, -4, -3, -2, -1 to +1, +2, +3, +4, +5, one can easily determine where they fall on the scale, and what kinds of things they could work on to acquire a more neutral, and less polarized, self-value.… (altro)