Thomas Day (3)Recensioni
Autore di The History of Sandford and Merton
Per altri autori con il nome Thomas Day, vedi la pagina di disambiguazione.
Recensioni
Questo sito utilizza i cookies per fornire i nostri servizi, per migliorare le prestazioni, per analisi, e (per gli utenti che accedono senza fare login) per la pubblicità. Usando LibraryThing confermi di aver letto e capito le nostre condizioni di servizio e la politica sulla privacy. Il tuo uso del sito e dei servizi è soggetto a tali politiche e condizioni.
The History of Sandford and Merton is an absolutely fascinating book, if one is interested in the history of children's literature and/or educational theory in the English-speaking world, and I am very glad indeed that it was included in the syllabus of my masters course. One can see the influence of such thinkers as Rousseau and Locke on Day, and how he used his two titular figures to explore the correct and incorrect way in which to raise and educate a young boy. Apparently, many of the 19th-century editions of the book excised the countless inset stories, related to the boys by their tutor, opting for a more streamlined narrative featuring just Sandford and Merton's doings. While I can certainly understand why that was done, in order to create a more enjoyable read for young children themselves, it does tend to rob the book of a certain 18th-century feeling that is most charming. It's not really the style now, but this sort of thing - the main narrative being interrupted for teaching tales, in order to illustrate a point - seems to have been almost ubiquitous at the time, and if one wants to get a sense of the original book, as its creator intended it, one should certainly lay hands on an edition that contains the unexpurgated 18th-century text. The edition I read was edited by Stephen Bygrave and Stephen Bending, and published by Broadview Press, who have reprinted a number of key 18th-century children's books, including Sarah Fielding's The Governess; or, The Little Female Academy. This is such a rich book, in terms of ideas, that I imagine it would yield a most interesting dissertation, in its own right. For my own part, I was struck by some of the egalitarian themes here - the idea that whites are not superior to blacks, the notion that wild animals deserve our protection, the rejection of class as the only indicator of virtue - ideas which, contrary to what some contemporary readers might expect, were not at all unusual in the pages of English children's literature of the late 18th century. Quite a few texts that I have read from this period, as it happens, address humane treatment of animals, benevolence toward the less fortunate, and the rejection of slavery as immoral. I don't want to overstate: there is much here that is outdated, and one need only read the book mentioned above, about Day's wife-training experiment, to appreciate that the author's notions of gender, and his expectations of women, were certainly not egalitarian. That said, I was still impressed by some of the positions taken by Day.
This is not everyday reading, and is not one I would recommend to everyone. I can't see today's children enjoying it, and even some adults who read children's literature might find it dry and off-putting. But for those readers interested in 18th-century children's literature and/or educational theory, it is a definite must! Just make sure, as mentioned, to obtain a copy with the full, original text.