Foto dell'autore

José Alaniz

Autore di Komiks: Comic Art in Russia

7+ opere 44 membri 6 recensioni

Sull'Autore

Comprende i nomi: Jose Alaniz, José Alaniz

Opere di José Alaniz

Opere correlate

A novel without lies (2000) — Traduttore, alcune edizioni23 copie

Etichette

Informazioni generali

Utenti

Recensioni

Naja Later’s excellent insights re the essential Deafness of comics as a medium — where sound is always made visible — is worth the price of admission.
 
Segnalato
JesseTheK | Mar 3, 2020 |
Jose Alaniz has written an extremely ambitious work in Death, Disability, and the Superhero. The first part of the book focuses primarily on disability and the superhero while, from chapter seven on death and the superhero takes center stage. As with any work that encompasses such a broad range of thought, there is a need for some basic assumptions to be made explicit from the beginning so that readers will understand how the writer will use and interpret some concepts. Unfortunately it is precisely in this introductory area where it seemed the scope of the study prevented Alaniz from clearly linking his premises and thus set up the rest of the book. This is unfortunate because the following chapters are very well researched and presented.

While I was initially more interested in the disability studies sections rather than those addressing death and mortality, I felt the latter chapters were better organized and presented. Often in the early chapters there were analyses which were quite effective as far as they went but tended to overlook intersections where additional factors also come into play. For instance the contrast between disabled and super-abled bodies could benefit from also addressing racial and gender issues. Let me say, however, that I don't consider this a particularly significant negative since the book touches on so many aspects of death and disability studies. One of the most valuable aspects of this work will be the future scholarship it will help to launch, furthering analyses begun here as well as filling gaps between what is and is not addressed here.

I anticipate revisiting most if not all of this book again in the future and expect to find it referenced widely in future research. This may not appeal to every casual comic fan, which is understandable, but I think many will also find new avenues into their favorite comics through the act of wrestling with some of this material. Scholars in the death and disability fields as well as popular culture and comics/graphic novels studies will find many useful points to ponder and address in future work.

Reviewed from a copy made available by the publisher via NetGalley.
… (altro)
½
 
Segnalato
pomo58 | 4 altre recensioni | Sep 28, 2015 |
ARC provided by NetGalley

Ever since the beginning of superhero culture we’ve seen them as invincible and indestructible. Until...we started to see “disabled” figures like The Thing, Daredevil, and others who proved they were not infallible or had something that prevented them from being “normal.” In this volume Jose Alaniz takes a look at comics alongside disability studies and dying studies, for an insightful look into our favorite superheroes in a new way. Alaniz helps us understand how fans turned away from wanting the infallible warrior of Superman, that became increasingly harder and harder to relate to, to heroes that could be injured or die or had something else that made them not “normal,” such as Daredevil whose blind. Its a fascinating look into understanding that, while comics missed out on covering many areas of life, that they did understand that people wanted heroes that were more like them. I give the book 3 out of 5 stars.… (altro)
 
Segnalato
zzshupinga | 4 altre recensioni | Jan 8, 2015 |
This is an entertaining book, although is is more on the order of pop psychology than substantive psychological insight. The thesis presented by Mr. Alaniz is that developments in the nature of the superheros that are in vogue at any given point in history are a reflection on the nature of ourselves, or at least a reflection on our perceptions of ourselves and the world we live in.

The thesis is interesting, and the author gives a fairly credible account of the plausibility of his take on graphic literature, but on the whole, the connection seems more contrived than substantive. If one wants to make the case that literature reflects the mindset of its creator, and that the creator of literature is simply a product of his/her culture, it is a point well taken.

It is entertaining, but it should be taken as light reading, and not as something insightful and substantial.
… (altro)
 
Segnalato
jpporter | 4 altre recensioni | Oct 22, 2014 |

Potrebbero anche piacerti

Autori correlati

Sarah Gibbons Contributor
Sarah Bowden Contributor
Daniel J. O'Rourke Contributor
Daniel Pinti Contributor
Naja Later Contributor
Charlie Christie Contributor
Marit Hanson Contributor
Lauren O'Connor Contributor
Lauranne Poharec Contributor

Statistiche

Opere
7
Opere correlate
2
Utenti
44
Popolarità
#346,250
Voto
½ 3.4
Recensioni
6
ISBN
19