Pagina principaleGruppiConversazioniAltroStatistiche
Cerca nel Sito
Questo sito utilizza i cookies per fornire i nostri servizi, per migliorare le prestazioni, per analisi, e (per gli utenti che accedono senza fare login) per la pubblicità. Usando LibraryThing confermi di aver letto e capito le nostre condizioni di servizio e la politica sulla privacy. Il tuo uso del sito e dei servizi è soggetto a tali politiche e condizioni.

Risultati da Google Ricerca Libri

Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.

Sto caricando le informazioni...

Red Families v. Blue Families: Legal Polarization and the Creation of Culture

di Naomi Cahn, June Carbone

UtentiRecensioniPopolaritàMedia votiConversazioni
654409,176 (3.61)Nessuno
Red Families v. Blue Families identifies a new family model geared for the post-industrial economy. Rooted in the urban middle class, the coasts and the "blue states" in the last three presidential elections, the Blue Family Paradigm emphasizes the importance of women's as well as men's workforce participation, egalitarian gender roles, and the delay of family formation until both parents are emotionally and financially ready. By contrast, the Red Family Paradigm--associated with the Bible Belt, the mountain west, and rural America--rejects these new family norms, viewing the change in moral and sexual values as a crisis. In this world, the prospect of teen childbirth is the necessary deterrent to premarital sex, marriage is a sacred undertaking between a man and a woman, and divorce is society's greatest moral challenge. Yet, the changing economy is rapidly eliminating the stable, blue collar jobs that have historically supported young families, and early marriage and childbearing derail the education needed to prosper. The result is that the areas of the country most committed to traditional values have the highest divorce and teen pregnancy rates, fueling greater calls to reinstill traditional values. Featuring the groundbreaking research first hailed in The New Yorker, this penetrating book will transform our understanding of contemporary American culture and law. The authors show how the Red-Blue divide goes much deeper than this value system conflict--the Red States have increasingly said "no" to Blue State legal norms, and, as a result, family law has been rent in two. The authors close with a consideration of where these different family systems still overlap, and suggest solutions that permit rebuilding support for both types of families in changing economic circumstances. Incorporating results from the 2008 election, Red Families v. Blue Families will reshape the debate surrounding the culture wars and the emergence of red and blue America.… (altro)
Nessuno
Sto caricando le informazioni...

Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro.

Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro.

Mostra 4 di 4
The authors’ stated intentions for this book was to find out “whether red families differ from blue ones… to see if we could find a geographic pattern in the statistics that corresponded to our understandings of red v. blue family strategies.” Their primary tactic for doing this is to look at overall state averages regarding a number of different issues, in an attempt to describe cultural patterns.

As I was reading the introduction, a statistic jumped out at me: “Thirty percent of American girls will become pregnant before they turn 20, and 80% of the pregnancies are unplanned.” This seemed extremely high to me, so I tried to find confirmation of this via the CDC and Department of Human and Health Services, to no avail. This statistic had no citation in the notes either (although other reports which are referenced do have footnotes), and this trend continued throughout the introduction. Similarly, in the first chapter, a chart lists the median age of marriage for men and women alongside the mean age of the woman at the first birth; by listing median and mean on the same chart, the two are being compared when they represent very different statistics (median is the middle of the range, mean is the average).

Overall, I think that this book is attempting to address more than it can actually encompass within the page limitations. The subtitle is “legal polarization and the creation of culture,” but it goes back and forth between addressing regional and political issues, focusing heavily on reproductive and gender role controversies. Although in topics it does manage to address, many interesting points and studies are cited, there are flaws as noted above. ( )
  resoundingjoy | Jan 1, 2021 |
This book helped me understand why I vote the way I do and the framework behind the "family values" I live with. Using plenty of statistics, the authors build a case for the politics of families, looking at issues of divorce, contraception, abortion, marriage, gender, and work. Same-sex marriage is also addressed, but this is one way the book shows its aged (published in 2010, before a certain landmark Supreme Court decision.) Despite the numbers and statistics, I would highly recommend this book to anyone interested in American politics. ( )
  wagner.sarah35 | Jan 2, 2017 |
okay to skim for ideas - another one of those books I would have preferred as a long magazine article! ( )
  lindap69 | Apr 5, 2013 |
This book was depressing for a different, though related reason: it reminded me just how far any discussion of action towards economic equality is from being politically acceptable in America. The red family model emphasizes early marriage and childbearing within marriage as a means of integration into the larger community, along with penalties for extramarital sex including the burden and stigma of out-of-wedlock births. Unfortunately, early marriage doesn’t work very well when divorce is readily available, and when even evangelicals are having plenty of premarital sex. The blue family model emphasizes waiting for economic security, which works really well for those who can achieve such security (and means their girls are less likely to get pregnant as teens or young adults; public tolerance coincides with private control over reproduction) but leaves out those for whom economic success won’t come at age 27 any more than it did at 20, and also puts fertility at risk even for the lucky ones. As the authors note, economic insecurity has rotted the foundations of heterosexual marriage, but somehow we’re talking about gay marriage. They advocate “pink” and “light blue” and “purple” solutions: focusing on increased access to contraception instead of the divisive topic of abortion, marriage counseling/education, federalism (by which they mean letting each state decide whether gay couples can marry), and increased attention to work/life balance—and that last is the weakest tea of all, only noting that right-wingers want to give employers more flexibility (as if that were the same as giving employees more flexibility) and left-wingers (the few of them left) want more requirements and not really suggesting what the middle ground might be. And of course there is no middle ground, any more than our politicians are going to agree to work together on improving access to contraception. Or, you know, economic equality. ( )
2 vota rivkat | Feb 19, 2011 |
Mostra 4 di 4
nessuna recensione | aggiungi una recensione

» Aggiungi altri autori

Nome dell'autoreRuoloTipo di autoreOpera?Stato
Cahn, Naomiautore primariotutte le edizioniconfermato
Carbone, Juneautore principaletutte le edizioniconfermato
Devi effettuare l'accesso per contribuire alle Informazioni generali.
Per maggiori spiegazioni, vedi la pagina di aiuto delle informazioni generali.
Titolo canonico
Titolo originale
Titoli alternativi
Data della prima edizione
Personaggi
Luoghi significativi
Eventi significativi
Film correlati
Epigrafe
Dedica
Incipit
Citazioni
Ultime parole
Nota di disambiguazione
Redattore editoriale
Elogi
Lingua originale
DDC/MDS Canonico
LCC canonico

Risorse esterne che parlano di questo libro

Wikipedia in inglese

Nessuno

Red Families v. Blue Families identifies a new family model geared for the post-industrial economy. Rooted in the urban middle class, the coasts and the "blue states" in the last three presidential elections, the Blue Family Paradigm emphasizes the importance of women's as well as men's workforce participation, egalitarian gender roles, and the delay of family formation until both parents are emotionally and financially ready. By contrast, the Red Family Paradigm--associated with the Bible Belt, the mountain west, and rural America--rejects these new family norms, viewing the change in moral and sexual values as a crisis. In this world, the prospect of teen childbirth is the necessary deterrent to premarital sex, marriage is a sacred undertaking between a man and a woman, and divorce is society's greatest moral challenge. Yet, the changing economy is rapidly eliminating the stable, blue collar jobs that have historically supported young families, and early marriage and childbearing derail the education needed to prosper. The result is that the areas of the country most committed to traditional values have the highest divorce and teen pregnancy rates, fueling greater calls to reinstill traditional values. Featuring the groundbreaking research first hailed in The New Yorker, this penetrating book will transform our understanding of contemporary American culture and law. The authors show how the Red-Blue divide goes much deeper than this value system conflict--the Red States have increasingly said "no" to Blue State legal norms, and, as a result, family law has been rent in two. The authors close with a consideration of where these different family systems still overlap, and suggest solutions that permit rebuilding support for both types of families in changing economic circumstances. Incorporating results from the 2008 election, Red Families v. Blue Families will reshape the debate surrounding the culture wars and the emergence of red and blue America.

Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche

Descrizione del libro
Riassunto haiku

Discussioni correnti

Nessuno

Copertine popolari

Link rapidi

Voto

Media: (3.61)
0.5
1
1.5
2 2
2.5 1
3 3
3.5
4 5
4.5
5 3

Sei tu?

Diventa un autore di LibraryThing.

 

A proposito di | Contatto | LibraryThing.com | Privacy/Condizioni d'uso | Guida/FAQ | Blog | Negozio | APIs | TinyCat | Biblioteche di personaggi celebri | Recensori in anteprima | Informazioni generali | 206,761,637 libri! | Barra superiore: Sempre visibile