A very precise and orthodox answer to the muddy, heretical New Perspective on Paul, yet respectful and considerate of its main modern proponent. Went a bit over my head with the Greek intrincacies at the last few pages. Helpful appendices. ( )

This is a good book but inconsistent at times. Piper suggests on one hand that the very gospel itself is at stake (citing Paul's famous words in chapter one of Galatians), yet he shies away from calling the "new perspectives" heretical. In one moment it seems he is playing the role of a Martin Luther and in another moment he's full of compliments for the genius and scholarship of those with whom he disagrees. Piper is clearly striving to be gracious, but I would have preferred if he were more direct.

I will also admit that this book was not nearly as engaging as Venema's book on the same subject (titled "The Gospel of Free Acceptance in Christ"). Piper is an outstanding pastor, teacher and author, but I found his argumentation confusing at times. I am very grateful for what Piper has done, and I am glad that he has contributed something in response to this dangerous heresy that is creeping into the Church. Still, I would suggest that those who would like to read more on this subject should read Venema's work. I highly recommend it. It is an outstanding resource that not only deals effectively with Wright, but more than that it exalts the glorious sufficiency of the work of Christ. It was not only intellectually stimulating, it was a comfort and blessing to my heart. ( )

Found N.T. Wright's book "Justification" to be much better. I recognize that I carry a bias but I still felt that the scholarship and presentation of concept was handled much better by Tom Wright ( )

Not bad for understanding Wright's covenantal theology in relation to the evangelical Reformed view of justification, but my time would have been better spent on other books this summer. See my review of N.T. Wright's "Justification: God's Plan and Paul's Vision" as well. Essentially, Piper and Wright seem to be talking past each other. Doug Wilson has some helpful thoughts on his blog: http://www.dougwils.com/?Action=Search&searchstring=n.t. wright ( )

Not bad for understanding Wright's covenantal theology in relation to the evangelical Reformed view of justification, but my time would have been better spent on other books this summer. See my review of N.T. Wright's "Justification: God's Plan and Paul's Vision" as well. Essentially, Piper and Wright seem to be talking past each other. Doug Wilson has some helpful thoughts on his blog: http://www.dougwils.com/?Action=Search&searchstring=n.t. wright ( )