Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.
Sto caricando le informazioni... The Ruling Race: A History of American Slaveholders (1982)di James Oakes
Sto caricando le informazioni...
Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro. Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro. nessuna recensione | aggiungi una recensione
This pathbreaking social history of the slaveholding South marks a turn in our understanding of antebellum America and the coming of the Civil War. Oakes's bracing analysis breaks the myth that slaveholders were a paternalistic aristocracy dedicated to the values of honor, race, and section. Instead they emerge as having much in common with their entrepreneurial counterparts in the North: they were committed to free-market commercialism and political democracy for white males. The Civil War was not an inevitable conflict between civilizations on different paths but the crack-up of a single system, the result of people and events. Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche |
Discussioni correntiNessunoCopertine popolari
Google Books — Sto caricando le informazioni... GeneriSistema Decimale Melvil (DDC)975History and Geography North America Southeastern U.S.Classificazione LCVotoMedia:
Sei tu?Diventa un autore di LibraryThing. |
The dominant slaveholding culture grew out of the colonial experience in America and embraced the diversity of southern society. It took form in the rapidly expanding slave economy of the antebellum period and so produced a world view that equated upward mobility with westward migration. For unlike plantation life, physical movement, upward mobility, and social fluidity shaped the destinies of the vast majority of American slaveholders. (p. 68)
That is to say, the Southern man sought to accumulate capital in the form of human beings. The road to becoming a planter was open to men of talent and drive in the South just as the road to becoming a merchant-capitalist was open in the North. Martin van Buren's call for planters and plain republicans to face west makes sense. The North and the South had a great deal in common, save the peculiar institution. Both were bourgeois societies according to Oakes.