Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.
Sto caricando le informazioni... The Strength of Poetry: Oxford Lecturesdi James Fenton
Sto caricando le informazioni...
Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro. Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro. These essays are cogently argued and thought-provoking. One of Fenton's great strengths that he is a lot more than a poet. He therefore has much to drawn on as he formulates his thoughts on the place of poetry in the pantheon of communication and art. The essays were originally lectures given by Fenton when he held the more or less honorary post of professor of poetry at Oxford. nessuna recensione | aggiungi una recensione
Why should a poet feel the need to be original? What is the relationship between genius and apprenticeship? James Fenton, Oxford Professor of Poetry from 1994 to 1999 and winner of the Whitbread Prize for Poetry, examines some of the most intriguing questions behind the making of the art - issues of creativity and the earning of success, of judgement, tutorage, rivalry and ambition. Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche |
Discussioni correntiNessunoCopertine popolari
Google Books — Sto caricando le informazioni... GeneriSistema Decimale Melvil (DDC)821.9109Literature English English poetry 1900- 1900-1999 History, description, critical appraisalClassificazione LCVotoMedia:
Sei tu?Diventa un autore di LibraryThing. |
In some ways, Fenton is better dealing with male poets. He writes with conviction and respect on Marianne Moore, Elizabeth Bishop, and Sylvia Plath. But he truly shines when discussing Wilfrid Owen, Seamus Heaney, D.H. Lawrence, and W.H. Auden, on whom there are three essays. Perhaps I should have placed Philip Larkin at the front of that list, but unusually here, Fenton’s scholarship and incisive observation diminishes rather than burnishes Larkin’s reputation. It was ever thus—poets move up or down in standing as critics disabuse us of our blinders with respect to them.
Fine criticism, I think, typically draws us back to the texts it explores with renewed enthusiasm. That is surely the case here. This is criticism that gently nudges us in certain directions and then, for the most part, seeks to absent the field. It returns us to the poems and lets their strengths act upon us. A fine collection of essays, highly recommended. ( )