Pagina principaleGruppiConversazioniAltroStatistiche
Cerca nel Sito
Questo sito utilizza i cookies per fornire i nostri servizi, per migliorare le prestazioni, per analisi, e (per gli utenti che accedono senza fare login) per la pubblicità. Usando LibraryThing confermi di aver letto e capito le nostre condizioni di servizio e la politica sulla privacy. Il tuo uso del sito e dei servizi è soggetto a tali politiche e condizioni.

Risultati da Google Ricerca Libri

Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.

Sto caricando le informazioni...

Kiss Kiss Bang Bang

di Pauline Kael

UtentiRecensioniPopolaritàMedia votiCitazioni
1843149,741 (3.88)17
An informal history of the movies--Jacket.
Aggiunto di recente daRoisinfee, DylanMayer, dpeace, David_Semaphore, jumblejim, magpiecity, JMS62
Biblioteche di personaggi celebriNelson Algren
Nessuno
Sto caricando le informazioni...

Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro.

Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro.

» Vedi le 17 citazioni

Mostra 2 di 2
Bitingly witty and knowledgeable. ( )
  Karen74Leigh | Sep 4, 2019 |
Well written reviews from a flourishing Age of the American cinema..and all good fun. "The Sound of Music", (AKA The sound of Money a la Kael ) Some James bond movies, "The Group", "Bonny and Clyde", Fiddler on the Roof', Blow-up" there are some very interesting moments in this volume. ( )
  DinadansFriend | Jul 13, 2019 |
Mostra 2 di 2
Miss Kael is the most quotable critic writing; but what is important and bracing is that she relates movies to other experience, to ideas and attitudes, to ambition, books, money, other movies, to politics and the evolving culture, to moods of the audience, to our sense of ourselves—to what movies do to us, the acute and self-scrutinizing awareness of which is always at the core of her judgment.

Miss Kael, currently a film critic for The New Yorker—the most recent piece in the book is here penetrating and controversial review of “Bonnie and Clyde”—has been finger-wagged for her irreverent cracks, for talking about herself too much, for being too flexible (unclassifiable?) in her tastes (she rather enjoyed “Hawaii”!), for not being properly awed by technique (she asks, ungratefully, that it serve substance and intention) and for various other failings that come with brains, wit, independence, spirit, humor, curiosity, candor and a flat refusal to be anybody’s toady. All can be relished in “Kiss Kiss Bang Bang” which, among other things, has the, niftiest title of the year.
aggiunto da SnootyBaronet | modificaThe New York Times, Eliot Fremont Smith
 
Good as these pieces are, however, they are overshadowed by the accomplishment of Miss Kael’s long article on the making of The Group that was commissioned and then rejected by Life. Along with her piece on “Movies on Television,” this is one of the handful of truly indispensable things written about films. Patiently, with a scrupulously nuanced attention both to her own role as a partici-pant-observer and to the characters of the main protagonists, Miss Kael gives us a picture of the complex human situation out of which films are actually made, and from which her argument about the transformation of movies by television is allowed to emerge without the slightest imposition.
aggiunto da SnootyBaronet | modificaCommentary
 
Does anything rate a Kiss Kiss? Yea. . . Bravo Bonnie and Clyde, flawed to be sure but the movie that ""has put the sting back into death."" One of the most inherently hilarious and incisive sections deals with the plums that plummet. In this case it's The Group which Miss Kael personally observed from mis-casting to missed plaudits. It's a stunning analysis of what went wrong and why. Along with other capsule reviews of contemporary films Miss Kael includes a section on ""Careers"": the current self-parody of Brando, the missed masterpieces of Orson Welles, etc., and for the home viewer: run-ups run-downs of old movies. Kiss Kiss or Bang Bang. . . never a dull moment from one of the most provocative critics in the country.
aggiunto da SnootyBaronet | modificaKirkus
 

Appartiene alle Serie

Devi effettuare l'accesso per contribuire alle Informazioni generali.
Per maggiori spiegazioni, vedi la pagina di aiuto delle informazioni generali.
Titolo canonico
Titolo originale
Titoli alternativi
Data della prima edizione
Personaggi
Luoghi significativi
Eventi significativi
Film correlati
Epigrafe
Dedica
Incipit
Dati dalle informazioni generali inglesi. Modifica per tradurlo nella tua lingua.
Early this year a producer-writer who began by goading me with lucrative offers—first to ghostwrite a book for him on "a sensational idea" (which turned out to be a denunciation of Method acting), then to work up a treatment for him on "an exciting new idea" (which turned out to be a spy spoof with a female spy), and then to do a quick (three-week) rewrite on a script he'd had sitting around for a decade—became rather hurt that I didn't rise to the bait.
Citazioni
Dati dalle informazioni generali inglesi. Modifica per tradurlo nella tua lingua.
A great many important people now, and throughout history, would probably, up close, seem very crude to the people who admire them from a distance.
I had asked him [Sidney Lumet] during one of our first talks why he had given up acting and he had begun a long explanation about how acting was a faggot’s career and how he knew that if he was ever going to give a woman a real human relationship, etc., and I had simply jotted down “too short for acting career.”
Sidney Buchman, courtly and urbane, told me that after his third reading of the novel and after discussion with Granville Hicks, he and Hicks agreed that the theme of The Group was: “Higher education does not fit women for life.” Not being used to the role of an observer (I never did get used to it), I shot back, “What does? Does higher education fit men for life?” He didn’t reply and was taken up with another matter.
“Well,” he said, “in the actual case it was based on, the man did rape a child, but if I told the truth, I wouldn’t have any movie, I couldn’t get people to feel compassion for him.”

I didn’t want to tell him that that was almost a definition of the artist’s task, so I just let it drop. But it occurred to me that this preposterous mixture of wanting to do good and yet evading the real problems — not even telling the simple truth if it might prejudice your case — was the basic cheat of Hollywood message movies.
Lumet is a man with a bad ear for dialogue and no eye. Genius? Yes, the genius necessary to convince people he’s a genius. Or, to put it more favorably, the determination to convince whoever needs convincing that, whatever it is, he can do it. And that is genius, of a kind. You don’t get to do much in this world without it. There are a great many sensitive, talented people around who will never do anything but treasure the superiority they feel to people like Lumet, who has pragmatic genius: he’ll get it done. It won’t be exquisite, it won’t be perfect, but it will reflect the energetic, “vulgar” confidence he put into it: it will have some charge or energy which may in some crazy way be more important than perfection anyway.
Ultime parole
Dati dalle informazioni generali inglesi. Modifica per tradurlo nella tua lingua.
(Click per vedere. Attenzione: può contenere anticipazioni.)
Nota di disambiguazione
Redattore editoriale
Elogi
Lingua originale
DDC/MDS Canonico
LCC canonico

Risorse esterne che parlano di questo libro

Wikipedia in inglese (1)

An informal history of the movies--Jacket.

Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche

Descrizione del libro
Riassunto haiku

Discussioni correnti

Nessuno

Copertine popolari

Link rapidi

Voto

Media: (3.88)
0.5
1 1
1.5
2
2.5
3 5
3.5 3
4 5
4.5
5 7

Sei tu?

Diventa un autore di LibraryThing.

 

A proposito di | Contatto | LibraryThing.com | Privacy/Condizioni d'uso | Guida/FAQ | Blog | Negozio | APIs | TinyCat | Biblioteche di personaggi celebri | Recensori in anteprima | Informazioni generali | 207,110,784 libri! | Barra superiore: Sempre visibile