Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.
Sto caricando le informazioni... The Idea of Communism 3: The Seoul Conferencedi Various
Nessuno Sto caricando le informazioni...
Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro. Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro. The Idea of Communism 3 is part of an ongoing discussion, initiated by Slavoj Zizek, on the continuing importance of communist ideals in contemporary society. The discussions and critiques, of both communist and capitalist states, are very insightful and offer much to those willing to consider many options to address today's societal ills. What this book is not is prescriptive. There are no even remotely developed plans for implementation of these ideas. That wasn't the purpose of this work, though it would be nice to read a bit about how to make the changes that are largely theorized quite well here. If you're looking for a call to arms this will likely disappoint you but if you are looking for a better grasp of communist ideas as they compare and contrast with contemporary capitalism, there is a great deal to like here. If you're like me, you'll be both pleased and disappointed, but far more positives here than negatives. Reviewed from a copy made available by the publisher via NetGalley. nessuna recensione | aggiungi una recensione
An all-star cast of radical intellectuals discuss the continued importance of communist principles In 2009 Slavoj Zizek brought together an acclaimed group of intellectuals to discuss the continued relevance of communism. Unexpectedly the conference attracted an audience of over 1,000 people. The discussion has continued across the world and this book gathers responses from the conference in Seoul. It includes the interventions of regular contributors Alain Badiou and Slavoj Zizek, as well as work from across Asia, notably from Chinese scholar Wang Hui, offering regional perspectives on communism in an era of global economic crisis and political upheaval. Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche |
Discussioni correntiNessuno
Google Books — Sto caricando le informazioni... GeneriSistema Decimale Melvil (DDC)320.532Social sciences Political Science Political Science Political ideologies Collectivism CommunismClassificazione LCVotoMedia:
Sei tu?Diventa un autore di LibraryThing. |
The speakers center on Asia and spend a great deal of time discussing China. The conference was held in Seoul on the Cold War divided peninsula of Korea. No one speaking at the conference accepted North Korea as part of “communism.” In fact, the Soviet Union is divided into Leninist and Stalinist periods. China is the example of where communism went wrong. There is a discussion of class difference and more importantly the state. Ideally, communism would lead to the disappearance of the state and the capitalist world's idea of nationalism. It also opposed Stalin's “socialism in one state.”
China as a state presents two problems to communism. The first is a dictatorial party government and second, the greater problem is the entrenched bureaucracy. Both lend themselves to the creation of a class on to their own above the worker and peasant. The conference was good at pointing out flaws in the current communist states as well as the flaws in capitalism. The problem lies in practical solutions. Leadership is needed initially, but once established refuses to let go. However, the idea of the population willing following a Rousseauian general will is impractical.
The conference does lend insight to the problems of communism in the 21st century. There is criticism and theory, but little in the way of practical solutions. Granted many of the same problems exist in capitalism and are starting to be recognized: Class difference, racial discrimination, pay difference between men and women, police abusing their authority, rising college costs preventing many attending or leaving them with near impossible debt, exporting manufacturing jobs, and European austerity programs. The point that problems, rejections of current and past government models, are being examined and criticized shows that at least on an intellectual level the idea of change and refinement is possible. This collection of opinions, however, is written for a very limited audience. An understanding of Maoist China and the current Chinese government is almost necessary.
( )