Pagina principaleGruppiConversazioniAltroStatistiche
Cerca nel Sito
Questo sito utilizza i cookies per fornire i nostri servizi, per migliorare le prestazioni, per analisi, e (per gli utenti che accedono senza fare login) per la pubblicità. Usando LibraryThing confermi di aver letto e capito le nostre condizioni di servizio e la politica sulla privacy. Il tuo uso del sito e dei servizi è soggetto a tali politiche e condizioni.

Risultati da Google Ricerca Libri

Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.

Sto caricando le informazioni...

Lactivism: How Feminists and Fundamentalists, Hippies and Yuppies, and Physicians and Politicians Made Breastfeeding Big Business and Bad Policy

di Courtney Jung

UtentiRecensioniPopolaritàMedia votiConversazioni
332734,981 (4.5)Nessuno
"Is breast really best? Breastfeeding is widely assumed to be the healthiest choice, yet growing evidence suggests that its benefits have been greatly exaggerated. New moms are pressured by doctors, health officials, and friends to avoid the bottle at all costs-often at the expense of their jobs, their pocketbooks, and their well-being. In Lactivism, political scientist Courtney Jung offers the most deeply researched and far-reaching critique of breastfeeding advocacy to date. Drawing on her own experience as a devoted mother who breastfed her two children and her expertise as a social scientist, Jung investigates the benefits of breastfeeding and asks why so many people across the political spectrum are passionately invested in promoting it, even as its health benefits have been persuasively challenged. What emerges is an eye-opening story about class and race in America, the big business of breastfeeding, and the fraught politics of contemporary motherhood."-- "Breastfeeding has become a moral imperative in 21st century America. Once upon a time, this moral imperative made sense. Breastfeeding was believed to bring multiple health benefits, including increased resistance to many chronic and even fatal diseases, protection against Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), improved intelligence, and countless immunities. The irony now, however, is that breastfeeding continues to gain moral force just as scientists are showing that its benefits have been greatly exaggerated. In 2012, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention declared the failure to breastfeed "a public health issue," thus placing bottle-feeding on par with smoking, obesity, and unsafe sex. Recently, politicians too have launched highly visible breastfeeding initiatives, such as former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg's well-publicized Latch On campaign. And, meanwhile, women who don't breastfeed their babies have found themselves with a lot of explaining to do. Physicians, public health officials, and other mothers are pressuring them to breastfeed even though the best science shows that the advantages of doing so are minimal at best. What is going on? In Lactivism, Courtney Jung offers the most deeply researched and far-reaching critique of the breastfeeding imperative to date. Drawing on a wide range of evidence, from rigorously peer-reviewed scientific research to interviews with physicians, politicians, business interests, activists, social workers, and mothers from across the social and political spectrum, Jung presents an eye-opening account of how a practice that began as an alternative to Big Business has become Big Business itself"--… (altro)
Nessuno
Sto caricando le informazioni...

Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro.

Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro.

Mostra 2 di 2
Note: I received a digital review copy of this book from the publisher through NetGalley.
  fernandie | Sep 15, 2022 |
The ultimate point of this book is to look at how breastfeeding (especially pumping) is now used politically -- example, pumping is a great excuse to not give paid maternity leave because LOOK! moms can attach plastic suction cups to their boobs and have other people feed their babies breast milk! I was very surprised by the WIC program that gives better benefits to moms that breastfeed over moms that give their child formula (even if it's because the mom CANNOT breastfeed). I was APPALLED by what I read regarding WHO, UNICEF, breastfeeding, and HIV. Very interesting reading for anyone that has breastfed or is planning to in the future.

Choices are important and we should have them. To have a baby or not to have a baby, to vaccinate or not to vaccinate, to breastfeed or not to breastfeed -- these are all choices that are up to women/mothers/parents. While I have opinions on what I think a person *should* do, it isn't up to me.

I chose to breastfeed (I also chose to vaccinate because *science*). Evie was exclusively breastfed for the first ten weeks, but then she went to daycare and we introduced breast milk via bottle. I pumped for months. I hated every second. I pumped because "breast is best" and I was under the impression that I was saving my child from measles (I know, silly, but there were all those measles outbreaks after she was born). Yes, breast milk does pass on some of those antibodies, but only for like a month. Anyway...breastfeeding was really pushed on my at the hospital. One of my nurses gave me this very emotional speech about her own struggles with breastfeeding and how she just kept trying. It was intense.

I always knew I was going to breastfeed though, I didn't need impassioned speeches. I'm still breastfeeding now and Evie is 18 months old. I think the bonding experience is worth it, it's a comfort for her. I would do it all again and breastfeed if I had another child...but you know what I wouldn't do? I wouldn't stress out about pumping (I didn't take an actual lunch break for roughly 6 months) and I would've introduced formula much sooner.

You also might like:
On Immunity and Breasts (by Florence Williams) ( )
  melissarochelle | May 18, 2016 |
Mostra 2 di 2
Culling an impressive array of research, Jung learns that the supremacy of “liquid gold” has driven commerce and public policy in ways that have little to do with the true needs of mothers and babies — and may even be harming them. The United States government, she discovers, penalizes poor women who don’t exclusively breast-feed by withholding benefits and iron-rich food from their babies — with no exceptions for women who may take medications or have health conditions that make breast-feeding unsafe for their infants. (Later, she tells us, the World Health Organization denied that H.I.V. could be transmitted through breast milk, despite plentiful evidence to the contrary.) Jung also takes us behind the scenes of groups with a financial interest in breast milk advocacy: lactation consultants, breast pump and breast-feeding accessory manufacturers, online purveyors of often unregulated breast milk, and websites whose offerings include “lactation lasagna” and (I can barely even type this) “momsicles.” But perhaps most interesting is Jung’s astute observation that what is being so ardently promoted isn’t actual breast-feeding — whereby a baby is fed from the breast — but human milk as a product, creating pressure for working mothers of all income levels to pump in less than ideal conditions, when what might benefit them and their babies most is paid maternity leave (or simply using formula).
 
Devi effettuare l'accesso per contribuire alle Informazioni generali.
Per maggiori spiegazioni, vedi la pagina di aiuto delle informazioni generali.
Titolo canonico
Titolo originale
Titoli alternativi
Data della prima edizione
Personaggi
Luoghi significativi
Eventi significativi
Film correlati
Epigrafe
Dedica
Incipit
Citazioni
Ultime parole
Nota di disambiguazione
Redattore editoriale
Elogi
Lingua originale
DDC/MDS Canonico
LCC canonico

Risorse esterne che parlano di questo libro

Wikipedia in inglese

Nessuno

"Is breast really best? Breastfeeding is widely assumed to be the healthiest choice, yet growing evidence suggests that its benefits have been greatly exaggerated. New moms are pressured by doctors, health officials, and friends to avoid the bottle at all costs-often at the expense of their jobs, their pocketbooks, and their well-being. In Lactivism, political scientist Courtney Jung offers the most deeply researched and far-reaching critique of breastfeeding advocacy to date. Drawing on her own experience as a devoted mother who breastfed her two children and her expertise as a social scientist, Jung investigates the benefits of breastfeeding and asks why so many people across the political spectrum are passionately invested in promoting it, even as its health benefits have been persuasively challenged. What emerges is an eye-opening story about class and race in America, the big business of breastfeeding, and the fraught politics of contemporary motherhood."-- "Breastfeeding has become a moral imperative in 21st century America. Once upon a time, this moral imperative made sense. Breastfeeding was believed to bring multiple health benefits, including increased resistance to many chronic and even fatal diseases, protection against Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), improved intelligence, and countless immunities. The irony now, however, is that breastfeeding continues to gain moral force just as scientists are showing that its benefits have been greatly exaggerated. In 2012, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention declared the failure to breastfeed "a public health issue," thus placing bottle-feeding on par with smoking, obesity, and unsafe sex. Recently, politicians too have launched highly visible breastfeeding initiatives, such as former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg's well-publicized Latch On campaign. And, meanwhile, women who don't breastfeed their babies have found themselves with a lot of explaining to do. Physicians, public health officials, and other mothers are pressuring them to breastfeed even though the best science shows that the advantages of doing so are minimal at best. What is going on? In Lactivism, Courtney Jung offers the most deeply researched and far-reaching critique of the breastfeeding imperative to date. Drawing on a wide range of evidence, from rigorously peer-reviewed scientific research to interviews with physicians, politicians, business interests, activists, social workers, and mothers from across the social and political spectrum, Jung presents an eye-opening account of how a practice that began as an alternative to Big Business has become Big Business itself"--

Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche

Descrizione del libro
Riassunto haiku

Discussioni correnti

Nessuno

Copertine popolari

Link rapidi

Voto

Media: (4.5)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4 2
4.5
5 2

Sei tu?

Diventa un autore di LibraryThing.

 

A proposito di | Contatto | LibraryThing.com | Privacy/Condizioni d'uso | Guida/FAQ | Blog | Negozio | APIs | TinyCat | Biblioteche di personaggi celebri | Recensori in anteprima | Informazioni generali | 205,861,581 libri! | Barra superiore: Sempre visibile