The black sheep of the Pym canon, I came to An Academic Question at the tail-end of my Pym journey, and find I rather like it.

Pym wrote this novel during her "wilderness years", the 16-year stretch in which her works were unpublished due to lack of interest from publishers. Her first draft was an attempt to write in the style of Margaret Drabble (which comes across in the first half) while her second draft tried to add a bit of weight to the piece, but neither impressed her enough - or publishers, as it turned out. After Pym's death in 1980, following her rediscovery by the world, her literary executors amended and trimmed the manuscript to create a version for publication.

The novel sits in an odd place between Pym's early and late periods. It is, I would argue, one of her least cynical novels. At the same time, it lacks (partly deliberately) the warmth and wit of her earlier, most popular works. And the tension of these elements is what makes it ultimately unsatisfying. The first half is quite strong, introducing a ready-made world in a university town, an unsatisfied academic's wife, and an oddball assortment of friends and acquaintances. But after a major revelation at the halfway point, one feels the Drabble-ness slip away. Pym's natural tendency is toward bittersweet endings, characters who don't get what they want, and know it, but who try and "make do" with what they have. Here, she is trying to fight this urge to be a different type of writer, and failing. In that sense, the second half feels adrift, although one can't really tell how much of that was the inevitable result of a draft manuscript being edited posthumously.

The secondary characters promise to sparkle, but don't always do so. The eponymous question provides grist for the plot but never perhaps becomes what it should. And the real question of the novel, posed with the midpoint revelation, is unsatisfactorily answered because it never really is. Pym shies away from following it down any particular path, retreating to the type of story she finds comfortable rather than the type of story she has set up for herself. Not ideal when you've already made it halfway up someone else's mountain!

Nevertheless - it may be odd to say - I found this immensely readable and, truthfully, more satisfying than the two preceding novels, No Fond Return of Love and An Unsuitable Attachment. Perhaps because the world feels more real in a sense. In my reading of her books, I feel that once she hit 50, Pym lost that youthful desire to write the comedies of manners which so sparkle at the start of her oeuvre. But she kept trying for some time, resulting in some lacklustre (although still quintessentially Pymian!) efforts. For all its faults, An Academic Question feels like a mature novelist adapting. This is the transition to the final stage of Pym's career, when she would write some of her most penetrating novels.

I would not direct new Pym fans to start here, as without the youthful wit or the mature depth it's not a notable read. But from my seasoned vantage-point, it did not really disappoint. ( )

So strange for Barbara Pym to have written in the first person. On the whole, I found that jarring, but not enough to shake me out of that wonderful Pym groove. ( )

De academische wereld volgens Barbara Pym. Onderhoudend maar niet haar beste boek. ( )

Pym's popularity has ebbed and flowed over the years and it looks like her novels are enjoying a bit of a resurgence, for good reason. I've only read one novel so far and its obvious that they can be read and enjoyed on the surface level or for their deeper and more tragic undertones.

I've already started recommending her to all of my friends who appreciate irony and sarcasm.

An Academic Question is a comedy of manners and an academic satire, with a smidgen of mystery/thriller. Underpinning it all are serious issues of self-fulfillment, career satisfaction, and relationships (romantic, friendship, work, familial), to name a few.

I was only planning on reading one of her novels for the Barbara Pym Reading Week, but just started my second, Jane and Prudence, which was first published in 1953. I don't remember the last time I've read two novels by an author back-to-back.

http://wildmoobooks.blogspot.com/2013/06/my-first-pym-academic-question.html ( )

"Pym is widely regarded as an Important Author in her time and genre, and as I've never read her I grabbed this at a library sale. I knew going into it that it wasn't considered 'major Pym' but is was a dollar and I figured it would give me a general idea of what to expect from her other works, one of which is on the TBR cliff.

All I can say is I think I missed something. Possibly, I missed everything. The cover's pull quotes all talk about the comedy and the introduction, written by Kate Saunders, refers to it as a 'comic novel'. I didn't see it. It's not a cultural thing either, I don't think; I generally find the British sense of humour incredibly funny.

Caro is the wife of an academic, in what I think must be somewhere around mid-century? 70's maybe?, who is bored, dissatisfied with her life and disinclined to do anything about it (or maybe feels helpless to do anything about it - it's unclear). She starts reading to a blind academic at the local old folks home, who happens to have a trunk full of papers that will advance her husband's career, so he visits with her one day and steals it. And lets her bear the burden of the guilt. Apparently a comedy of errors ensues; apparently so subtly that it flew right past me without notice.

I thought about going 2.5 stars, because honestly nothing ever happens, but in spite of its unfinished feel, I didn't mind the writing. I wasn't bored when I was reading it, and that has to be worth something, I guess." ( )