![](https://image.librarything.com/pics/fugue21/magnifier-left.png)
![](https://pics.cdn.librarything.com/picsizes/e6/66/e6668ec85074eb7593531735141433041414141_v5.jpg)
Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.
Sto caricando le informazioni... Yahweh Is a Warrior: The Theology of Warfare in Ancient Israel (Christian Peace Shelf)di Millard C. Lind
![]() Nessuno Sto caricando le informazioni...
![]() Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro. Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro. "While timely, 'holy war' does not appear to be a very promising topic for a professor of Bible in one of the traditional 'peace' churches...Nevertheless, Millard Lind, in an original and courageous essay has challenged conventional wisdom about biblical warfare, and from a systematic reexamination of the biblical materials has presented a new and important thesis". ~David Noel Freedman nessuna recensione | aggiungi una recensione
Millard C. Lind's classic study of warfare in ancient Israel. Israel saw God alone as delivering his people, without the need of human warriors. Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche |
Discussioni correntiNessuno
![]() GeneriSistema Decimale Melvil (DDC)296.3Religions Other Religions Judaism Jewish philosophyClassificazione LCVotoMedia:![]()
Sei tu?Diventa un autore di LibraryThing. |
"What does it mean for biblical theology that Yahweh is a warrior? My purpose in this work is to identify and discuss the main aspects of ancient Israel's theology of violent political power. Th three theme to be developed in these chapters are: (1) that Yahweh as God of War fought for his people by miracle, not by sword and spear, (2) that this method of fighting affected Israel's theo-political structure in a fundamental way; and (3) that Yahweh's warfare was directed not only against Israel's enemies but at times against Israel herself. In such cases not by means of miracle but by the armies of the enemies of Israel" (23)
Lind makes an important contribution by showing how significant this strand is, running as it does through all the 'primary history (Gen-2 Kings) in it is easy to show that it is strong in the prophetic tradition also, especially Isaiah and Jeremiah. However Lind skips far too lightly over texts which present a different picture. For example he dismissed the Ban (herem) as an inherited practice, even though it plays a central role in several texts. So overall a useful volume somewhat marred by being overstated. (