Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.
Sto caricando le informazioni... The Land Was Ours: African American Beaches from Jim Crow to the Sunbelt Southdi Andrew W. Kahrl
Sto caricando le informazioni...
Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro. Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro. nessuna recensione | aggiungi una recensione
Premi e riconoscimenti
The coasts of today's American South feature luxury condominiums, resorts, and gated communities, yet just a century ago, a surprising amount of beachfront property in the Chesapeake, along the Carolina shores, and around the Gulf of Mexico was owned and populated by African Americans. Blending social and environmental history, Andrew W. Kahrl tells the story of African American-owned beaches in the twentieth century. By reconstructing African American life along the coast, Kahrl demonstrates just how important these properties were for African American communities and leisure, as well as for economic empowerment, especially during the era of the Jim Crow South. However, in the wake of the civil rights movement and amid the growing prosperity of the Sunbelt, many African Americans fell victim to effective campaigns to dispossess black landowners of their properties and beaches. Kahrl makes a signal contribution to our understanding of African American landowners and real-estate developers, as well as the development of coastal capitalism along the southern seaboard, tying the creation of overdeveloped, unsustainable coastlines to the unmaking of black communities and cultures along the shore. The result is a skillful appraisal of the ambiguous legacy of racial progress in the Sunbelt. Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche |
Discussioni correntiNessunoCopertine popolari
Google Books — Sto caricando le informazioni... GeneriSistema Decimale Melvil (DDC)333.3089Social sciences Economics Economics of land & energy Private ownershipClassificazione LCVotoMedia:
Sei tu?Diventa un autore di LibraryThing. |
The book is also an excellent demonstration of the truth in Carol Rose’s work on the significant but undersung role of pleasure in property law—especially in the law relating to water and its associated shores. It’s further an excellent illustration of Ta-Nahesi Coates’ argument about white expropriation of black wealth, which was repeated, coordinated, reinforced by overlapping levels of government and private agreements, and kicked into panic gear whenever African-Americans seemed to be accumulating sufficient land to provide them with security/less need to depend on whites (to which something like intellectual property or success in sports might intriguingly and sadly be contrasted).
“Working within discriminatory real estate markets and denied equal access to credit, African Americans with ambitions to own land and start businesses were often led to enter into dubious investment schemes, take out large loans on usurious terms, or engage in other necessary risks in order to achieve the American dream of landed and economic independence.” If the contract terms weren’t bad enough, white businesses would conspire to destroy black competition, often with the assistance of local governments and their permit powers, and in extremis there was always fire or other acts of terrorism to destroy working capital. Discriminatorily assessed local property taxes, insulated from outside scrutiny, were also deployed to prevent blacks from living in areas whites wanted for themselves. Internal divisions among African-Americans led some “higher-class” (and often lighter-skinned) people to try to exclude others they perceived as socially beneath them using language indistinguishable from that of the politer white racists, though this wasn’t aided by government as it would have been with whites—instead, Maryland sheriffs underpoliced African-American beach areas, allowing both whites and blacks to misbehave.
Even successfully participating in capitalism could mean extracting wealth from fellow African-Americans, often the only apparent source of advancement. Then in later years, when formal segregation was no longer legal and the land became valuable to white people, distant heirs might force a sale at below-market rates for a small share of what was otherwise worthless to them. “Fifty years ago, a wooden groin topped with a metal fence extended into the waters off Hampton’s shore [in Virginia], dividing ‘white’ from ‘colored’ sand and water and, perhaps fittingly, accelerating rates of erosion on both sides.” Now there are expensive homes and colorblind, facially neutral regimes that somehow still end up with white people on top. ( )