Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.
Sto caricando le informazioni... Animal (Doctor Who: The Lost Stories)di Andrew Cartmel
Nessuno Sto caricando le informazioni...
Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro. Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro. nessuna recensione | aggiungi una recensione
Margrave University in 2001, and Raine Creevy is enjoying her first trip into the future. With enemies on all sides, the Doctor teams up with his old friend Brigadier Bambera and the forces of UNIT in a battle for the future of the whole world. Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche |
Discussioni correntiNessunoCopertine popolari
Google Books — Sto caricando le informazioni... GeneriSistema Decimale Melvil (DDC)823.914Literature English English fiction Modern Period 1901-1999 1945-1999VotoMedia:
Sei tu?Diventa un autore di LibraryThing. |
"Afoot" might be an exaggeration, as Animal is the longest hour and 50 minutes you will ever spend listening to a Big Finish audio drama. I'm not remotely sure how they managed to fill up that much time, because certainly nothing happens in this story. In Part One, Ace and Raine infiltrate a campus organization dedicated to the liberation of animals in two seconds. Meanwhile, the Doctor and Bambera look at some plants. You might think these plants are important to the plot for all the time spent on them, but they just turn out to be a convenient way to resolve the actual plot of the story. Animal suffers from similar structural problems to Crime of the Century, actually: there are multiple unrelated storylines, which only intersect when one can provide a convenient way to wrap up another. Even when important things do happen in this story, they’re often only related to us. For some reason, once the aliens show up, all their major actions are only depicted via the Doctor and Bambera talking to each other about things they both already know.
Director Ken Bentley talks a bit in the extras about how Cartmel's writing is so different because it jumps around in tone and the structure is weird and the tension is unusual. "Different" is one word for it. "Terrible" might be another.
You can read a longer version of this review at Unreality SF.