![](https://image.librarything.com/pics/fugue21/magnifier-left.png)
![Oryx And Crake di Margaret Atwood](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/P/0349004064.01._SX180_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg)
Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.
Sto caricando le informazioni... Oryx And Crake (originale 2003; edizione 2003)di Margaret Atwood (Autore)
Informazioni sull'operaL'ultimo degli uomini di Margaret Atwood (2003)
![]()
Best Dystopias (17) » 93 altro Booker Prize (39) Top Five Books of 2013 (123) Favourite Books (255) Female Author (133) Five star books (87) Unreliable Narrators (37) A Novel Cure (116) Unread books (191) Sense of place (27) Top Five Books of 2020 (449) Top Five Books of 2014 (875) Best Satire (83) 2000s decade (20) Top Five Books of 2021 (487) Top Five Books of 2017 (611) Magic Realism (165) Books Read in 2024 (1,030) Books Read in 2008 (22) Books Read in 2023 (1,714) Favorite Series (228) io9 Book Club (5) Books Read in 2013 (1,166) KayStJ's to-read list (310) AP Lit (143) Books Set in Canada (56) Love and Marriage (62) Read These Too (54) Florida (19) Read in 2015 (2) SHOULD Read Books! (99) Strange Cities (10) High Priority (9) Books I read in 2014 (10) Robinsonade Novels (49) Dystopia Must-Reads (10) To Read (4) Speculative Fiction (23) Phoebe Bridgers (8) Fiction For Men (100) Climate Change (9) Sto caricando le informazioni...
![]() Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro.
Whomever payed attention to the last 3 years and ever had the change to read Oryx and Crake will certainly notice the familiarity between Atwood's sharp depiction of a pre- and post-apolitical world and the world of today. Going back to a naive 2005 when I first read this book, I imagine if Atwood's dystopia lies in the realm of prophecy, analytical prediction or just a pure and vivid fantastic fiction. One thing is for sure, the naive fascination and deep admiration for her work that I felt as a first time reader remains untouched despite the sight of a future that looks each day more like fiction. Sometida a los estragos de una terrible plaga; la humanidad afronta una azarosa huida hacia adelante. En esta primera entrega de la trilogía de MADDADDAM ?que se completa con El año del Diluvio y Maddaddam?; Margaret Atwood nos invita a adentrarnos en un futuro tan verosímil como inquietante. Conocido como Jimmy antes de que el planeta se viese asolado por una serie de desastres naturales; Hombre de las Nieves llora la pérdida de Crake; su mejor amigo; y de la esquiva Oryx; de quien ambos estaban enamorados; mientras lucha por sobrevivir en soledad sobre la faz de la Tierra. A merced de los elementos; acechado por los recuerdos y sin más compañía que la de los Hijos de Crake; esos seres de ojos verdes que lo consideran una especie de profeta; Hombre de las Nieves se pregunta cómo ha podido cambiar todo en tan poco tiempo y emprende un doble viaje hacia su pasado y hacia la burbuja de alta tecnología creada por Crake; el lugar donde empezó todo. La crítica ha dicho... «Un retrato feroz de la globalización y de un mundo que se desgarra por sus costuras ecológicas
Oryx and Crake is a piece of dystopian fiction written from the point of Snowman (known as Jimmy in his former life) – the last human left on Earth. At least, he believes he’s the last human left on Earth until the end of the book. I found the parts of the book describing Snowman’s journey to Paradice (the dome in the compound where Crake did his work) to be a lot less interesting than his recollections of his previous life as Jimmy. I loved reading about how Jimmy and Crake met, the little signs that Crake gave off as to what he might be planning and the direction his thoughts might take in the future (though Jimmy didn’t recognize these until it was too late), etc. Crake is really the star of the show in this book in my mind – Jimmy simply acts as a vessel for us to learn about a character who is dead and who therefore cannot teach us about himself. Snowman’s adventures in real time seem almost pointless to me. Why not dedicate the whole book to Jimmy’s friendship with Crake, with just a bit of general explanation as to what’s going on now? I think the present would have been much more interesting if the Crakers were explored more than Jimmy’s struggle to survive and come to grips with what Crake had done. On the whole, however, I thought it was a great book. Set sometime in the future, this post-apocalyptic novel takes scientific research in the hands of madmen to its logical and frightening conclusion. Inspiring readers to pay more attention to the world around them, Atwood offers cautionary notes about the environment, bioengineering, the sacrifice of civil liberties, and the possible loss of those human values which make life more than just a physical experience. As the novel opens, some catastrophe has occurred, effectively wiping out human life. Only one lonely survivor and a handful of genetically altered humanoids remain, and they are slowly starving as they try to adjust to their changed circumstances. In Margaret Atwood's first attempt at writing a novel, the main character was an ant swept downriver on a raft. She abandoned that book after the opening scene and became caught up in other activities, which she has described as ''sissy stuff like knitting and dresses and stuffed bunnies.'' That certainly does not sound like Ms. Atwood, who is known for the boldness of her fiction. Of course she was only 7 at the time. Margaret Atwood has always taken a jaundiced view of human nature. Back when her mordant observations about marriage and other relations between the sexes had her marked down as a feminist, she took pains to fire off several novels in a row featuring weak, manipulative, dishonest and outright bad women, partly to prove that her skepticism was distributed fairly. She has always been of the opinion that people are a mixed bag of the occasionally decent and the frequently mendacious and that there's not much anyone can do to change that fact. Genetic tinkering. Rampant profiteering. A deadly virus that sweeps the globe. Are these last Tuesday's headlines or our future? In Margaret Atwood's novel Oryx and Crake, the answer is both. For Atwood, our future is the catastrophic sum of our oversights. It's a depressing view, saved only by Atwood's biting, black humor and absorbing storytelling. È contenuto inHa come guida per lo studentePremi e riconoscimentiMenzioniElenchi di rilievo
Snowman vive su un albero vicino al mare, avvolto in un lenzuolo sporco. Non sa che ore sono, nessuno lo sa pi©£, dopo la pandemia. Cerca cibo e medicine nelle terre desolate e infestate da ibridi di animali. Fruga fra i resti e rimugina sulle scelte che hanno portato la Terra al tracollo, in nome di una scienza onnipotente. Si abbandona al ricordo di Oryx, donna enigmatica e quieta, e al rancore per l'amico Crake, responsabile del disastro. Le loro esistenze si erano intrecciate nel pi©£ classico e tragico dei triangoli. Snowman cerca una spiegazione, per s©♭ e per i ℗±figli di Crake℗ ,unica forma di vita intelligente sopravvissuta sulla Terra, frutto esemplare dell'ingegneria genetica. Sono tante le cose che vogliono capire, ignari come sono dell'insensatezza degli uomini. Come hanno dimostrato Orwell, Huxley, Vonnegut e la stessa Atwood (nel Racconto dell'Ancella),la rappresentazione letteraria di un'utopia fallita pu©ø aprirci gli occhi pi©£ di innumerevoli verit© sullo stato del pianeta. Quello di Oryx e Crake ©· un mondo che potrebbe essere a pochi anni, a poche folli decisioni di distanza da quello in cui viviamo. Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche |
Discussioni correntiNessunoCopertine popolari
![]() GeneriSistema Decimale Melvil (DDC)813.54Literature English (North America) American fiction 20th Century 1945-1999Classificazione LCVotoMedia:![]()
Sei tu?Diventa un autore di LibraryThing. |
As an adult, Jimmy has renamed himself Snowman (after The Abominable), and as far as he knows, he's the last "real" human left alive. There's a group of genetically engineered people, the Children of Crake, but they're not the same. He's left alone, in a devastated world, with only his memories and his guilt over the role he played in it all. These memories make up the bulk of the book, with very little actually happening in an actual plot sense. Jimmy does venture back to the last place he lived in search of food and sunscreen and medicine, which forces him to confront what happened with Glenn, who became Crake, and the beautiful, reserved Oryx, who was involved with them both. How they died, and how the virus that wreaked havoc on the rest of the world was released.
It's a character study as much as a work of speculative fiction, and that's really Atwood's strength anyways. She loves to dig into the ways our little flaws can set in motion events that spiral out of control, to take the tensions underlying society and drag them up into the open. I find it really interesting that this book was written in 2003, the year I graduated high school, because so much of it seems to apply to the kinds of debates that continue to be relevant even now: just because we have the technology or knowledge to do something, does that mean we should? How do we weigh morality? Whose morality gets weighed? The writing date of the book does mean there are some things that come off anachronistic (she posits a world focused on disc-based storage, in which email is a primary communication method), a lot of it is startlingly prescient.
Clearly I liked it, but it was not without failings. The biggest, for me, was its lack of developed female characters. Jimmy's mother is intriguing, but we see relatively little of her and through mostly his eyes, reflecting on the way her choices impacted him. Oryx remains to the reader just as mystifying as she largely is to Jimmy, and while I could see Atwood intending this as a statement of how men tend to project their own stories only the women they claim to love (Jimmy is convinced he knows parts of Oryx's past, which she herself denies), I wish we'd gotten more of her perspective. And as much as I enjoy character-driven novels, I wish it had been structured differently, so that it was taking place in the present rather than largely in the past. These are relatively minor issues, though. On the whole, this book is fascinating and thought-provoking and one I'd recommend widely (though maybe not younger/less sophisticated teenagers). (