Pagina principaleGruppiConversazioniAltroStatistiche
Cerca nel Sito
Questo sito utilizza i cookies per fornire i nostri servizi, per migliorare le prestazioni, per analisi, e (per gli utenti che accedono senza fare login) per la pubblicità. Usando LibraryThing confermi di aver letto e capito le nostre condizioni di servizio e la politica sulla privacy. Il tuo uso del sito e dei servizi è soggetto a tali politiche e condizioni.

Risultati da Google Ricerca Libri

Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.

Sto caricando le informazioni...

Perché uccidono: le scoperte di un criminologo indipendente (1999)

di Richard Rhodes

UtentiRecensioniPopolaritàMedia votiCitazioni
269498,684 (3.63)8
Why do some men, women and even children assault, batter, rape, mutilate and murder? In his stunning new book, the Pulitzer Prize-winner Richard Rhodes provides a startling and persuasive answer. Why They Killexplores the discoveries of a maverick American criminologist, Dr. Lonnie Athens -- himself the child of a violent family -- which challenge conventional theories about violent behavior. By interviewing violent criminals in prison, Dr. Athens has identified a pattern of social development common to all seriously violent people -- a four-stage process he calls "violentization": -- First, brutalization: A young person is forced by violence or the threat of violence to submit to an aggressive authority figure; he witnesses the violent subjugation of intimates, and the authority figure coaches him to use violence to settle disputes. -- Second, belligerency: The dispirited subject, determined to prevent his further violent subjugation, heeds his coach and resolves to resort to violence. -- Third, violent performances: His violent response to provocation succeeds, and he reads respect and fear in the eyes of others. -- Fourth, virulency: Exultant, he determines from now on to utilize serious violence as a means of dealing with people -- and he bonds with others who believe as he does. Since all four stages must be fully experienced in sequence and completed to produce a violent individual, we see how intervening to interrupt the process can prevent a tragic outcome. Rhodes supports Athens's theory with historical evidence and shows how it explains such violent careers as those of Perry Smith (the killer central to Truman Capote's narrativeIn Cold Blood), Mike Tyson, "preppy rapist" Alex Kelly, and Lee Harvey Oswald. Why They Killchallenges with devastating evidence the theory that violent behavior is impulsive, unconsciously motivated and predetermined. It offers compelling insights into the terrible, ongoing dilemma of criminal violence that plagues families, neighborhoods, cities and schools.… (altro)
Nessuno
Sto caricando le informazioni...

Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro.

Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro.

» Vedi le 8 citazioni

Mostra 4 di 4
Richard Rhodes is one of my favorite authors. I first encountered his work when I read The Making of the Atomic Bomb. His book, Why They Kill, is unique in my experience, in that it is a blend of both biography and sociology. It is the biography of Lonnie Athens who lived a violent life as a youth and later dedicated his life to the investigation of the source of violence in criminals. It is also a presentation of Athens' findings and an examination of the results of applying those findings to criminals who Athens had not studied. The result of this, due greatly to the writing skills of the author, is a fascinating and unique story of the sociology of criminal life and the pathology of violence. This is a challenging book for those readers interested in why some humans kill. ( )
  jwhenderson | Jul 1, 2010 |
In the introduction to Why They Kill, Richard Rhodes describes a pretty horrific episode in his childhood where he as forced to confront the violence that so many have experienced. Many of his books deal with different aspects of violence, and he uses these works to understand his experience. In Why They Kill, Rhodes focuses on ultraviolent criminals - why they do what they do and how they become so violent in the first place.

Why They Kill is really two books in one. The first is a biography of Lonnie Athens, the maverick criminologist of the subtitle. He's a product of the world of the ultraviolent criminal, but managed to escape into a rather unwelcoming academia. The biographical section also includes a detailed explanation of Athens' theory of violentization, the process he proposes by which ultraviolent criminals are made. The second book is a series of tests of Athen's theory, for example against famous folk such as Lee Harvey Oswald and Mike Tyson.

Criminology is well outside my area of expertise, but Athens' theory seems sensible to me. It appears to explain the process by which people become violent and the mitigations discussed at the end of the book are in line with successful intervention programs. I suspect that the situation, however, is more complicated than presented here. Genetic factors are ignored, and the possibility of mental illness or learning disabilities in violent offenders are dismissed out of hand. Rhodes, and by extension, Athens, claims that the theory explains every violent person, however cases which don't appear to fit the theory are assumed to be cases where the person (or the researcher) are not telling the whole story and so the argument becomes somewhat circular.

All in all, I think the book was worth reading, although Rhodes was a bit drier in this one than in others of his that I've read. The ideas should be taken with a grain of salt, but are well worth thinking about. ( )
1 vota drneutron | Jun 30, 2009 |
This was an interesting book that I picked up after reading about it on LT. Richard Rhodes writes about Lonnie Athens, a criminologist, and the theories he has developed about the nature of human violence. I'm not sure that Athens' theories explain all violence EVER, as Rhodes seems to, but the book is certainly food for thought. I had some problems, as an anthropology student, with the chapter on violence in "primitive" societies, in particular. Some of the sociology chapters were very dense--- I'm not sure I'll ever understand Athens's theory of the self, as explained, let alone the earlier theories that were merely referenced. The most interesting chapters to me were the ones on medieval history and on modern warfare. Overall, an intriguing read, and I came away thinking about the nature of violence and also impressed, once more, with the need to curb child abuse and other forms of violence, particularly against children. Well worth reading, if not without its flaws. ( )
  allthesedarnbooks | Feb 14, 2009 |
This book has a lot of interesting ideas about the development of violent criminals, and I'd recommend it to anyone. That being said, I am not convinced that violentization accounts for all cases of criminal violence out there.

One problem is that Athens and Rhodes assume that those who deny having gone through violentization, are lying. Unfortunately for Athens, these types of assumptions weaken his theory. Because he doesn't have concrete proof that these individuals completed the violentization process, it is possible that other processes were at work.

He also completely ignores the role of genetics and individual character traits in this process. Perhaps certain individuals are more prone to complete the violentization process? Furthermore, Athens and Rhodes deny that people can react to individuals who remind them of people in their past. This is simply untrue.

Finally, it is difficult to understand why ultraviolent criminals have reached the point of no return and, essentially, society should lock them up and throw away the key. Why does the process of fragmentation and rebuilding of ones phantom community not apply to these cases?

In general, this was a great read, however I do believe that violentization is only a piece of the puzzle. It is easy to take those who have comitted violent crimes and shove them into this neat mold (incidentally, Rhodes didn't do a very convincing job of this). It's much more difficult to prove that 1) violentization is common to ALL violent criminals, and 2) ALL individuals who go through violentization end up being violent criminals. ( )
3 vota solitude1984 | Mar 25, 2007 |
Mostra 4 di 4
nessuna recensione | aggiungi una recensione
Devi effettuare l'accesso per contribuire alle Informazioni generali.
Per maggiori spiegazioni, vedi la pagina di aiuto delle informazioni generali.
Titolo canonico
Dati dalle informazioni generali inglesi. Modifica per tradurlo nella tua lingua.
Titolo originale
Titoli alternativi
Data della prima edizione
Personaggi
Luoghi significativi
Eventi significativi
Film correlati
Epigrafe
Dati dalle informazioni generali inglesi. Modifica per tradurlo nella tua lingua.
I and the public know What all schoolchildren learn, Those to whom evil is done Do evil in return. - W. H. Auden
Dedica
Dati dalle informazioni generali inglesi. Modifica per tradurlo nella tua lingua.
For Ginger
Incipit
Dati dalle informazioni generali inglesi. Modifica per tradurlo nella tua lingua.
From the Prologue: Why do they kill?
Citazioni
Ultime parole
Nota di disambiguazione
Redattore editoriale
Elogi
Lingua originale
DDC/MDS Canonico
LCC canonico

Risorse esterne che parlano di questo libro

Wikipedia in inglese (3)

Why do some men, women and even children assault, batter, rape, mutilate and murder? In his stunning new book, the Pulitzer Prize-winner Richard Rhodes provides a startling and persuasive answer. Why They Killexplores the discoveries of a maverick American criminologist, Dr. Lonnie Athens -- himself the child of a violent family -- which challenge conventional theories about violent behavior. By interviewing violent criminals in prison, Dr. Athens has identified a pattern of social development common to all seriously violent people -- a four-stage process he calls "violentization": -- First, brutalization: A young person is forced by violence or the threat of violence to submit to an aggressive authority figure; he witnesses the violent subjugation of intimates, and the authority figure coaches him to use violence to settle disputes. -- Second, belligerency: The dispirited subject, determined to prevent his further violent subjugation, heeds his coach and resolves to resort to violence. -- Third, violent performances: His violent response to provocation succeeds, and he reads respect and fear in the eyes of others. -- Fourth, virulency: Exultant, he determines from now on to utilize serious violence as a means of dealing with people -- and he bonds with others who believe as he does. Since all four stages must be fully experienced in sequence and completed to produce a violent individual, we see how intervening to interrupt the process can prevent a tragic outcome. Rhodes supports Athens's theory with historical evidence and shows how it explains such violent careers as those of Perry Smith (the killer central to Truman Capote's narrativeIn Cold Blood), Mike Tyson, "preppy rapist" Alex Kelly, and Lee Harvey Oswald. Why They Killchallenges with devastating evidence the theory that violent behavior is impulsive, unconsciously motivated and predetermined. It offers compelling insights into the terrible, ongoing dilemma of criminal violence that plagues families, neighborhoods, cities and schools.

Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche

Descrizione del libro
Riassunto haiku

Discussioni correnti

Nessuno

Copertine popolari

Link rapidi

Voto

Media: (3.63)
0.5 1
1
1.5
2 1
2.5 1
3 8
3.5 4
4 12
4.5
5 5

Sei tu?

Diventa un autore di LibraryThing.

 

A proposito di | Contatto | LibraryThing.com | Privacy/Condizioni d'uso | Guida/FAQ | Blog | Negozio | APIs | TinyCat | Biblioteche di personaggi celebri | Recensori in anteprima | Informazioni generali | 204,753,112 libri! | Barra superiore: Sempre visibile