Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.
|
Sto caricando le informazioni... Revelation (Interpretation: A Bible Commentary for Teaching & Preaching) (edizione 1989)di M. Eugene Boring (Autore)
Informazioni sull'operaRevelation (Interpretation, a Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching) di M. Eugene Boring
   Nessuno Sto caricando le informazioni...
 Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro. Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro.  deusvitae | Aug 1, 2017 |  nessuna recensione | aggiungi una recensione
Appartiene alle Serie
Throughout the history of Christianity, the book of Revelation has had an enormous influence in religion, history, and culture, and it still has an urgently needed message for the church. M. Eugene Boring's critical assessment of Revelation enlightens readers as to just what that message is. Interpretation: A Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching is a distinctive resource for those who interpret the Bible in the church. Planned and written specifically for teaching and preaching needs, this critically acclaimed biblical commentary is a major contribution to scholarship and ministry. Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche |
Discussioni correntiNessunoCopertine popolari
 Google Books — Sto caricando le informazioni...GeneriSistema Decimale Melvil (DDC)228.07Religions Bible Apocalypse Book of RevelationClassificazione LCVotoMedia: (3.78)
Sei tu?Diventa un autore di LibraryThing. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1
As fits the genre a large portion of the commentary introduces Revelation and seeks to explain not only how it came about but also some of the history of interpretation and the unique challenges of Revelation.
The author considers the text in a unitary, linear progression, with frequent foreshadowing of final judgment. He seeks to understand the text fully in its context and thus sees Rome as the primary "opponent" in view in terms of the beast and Babylon, etc. He would consider John as premillennial but the proper view of the millennium as amillennial (and does well to show its comparative insignificance in the text as compared to the attention devoted to it in Christendom).
Overall, though, worth exploring when engaging in a full study of Revelation. (