Summary: tells about a unprofound triple crisis in america. Takes place after work war II and the author give us his point of view on the government and the limiting of power they have or should have.
My reaction: I love history it is one of my favorite subjects and it is very interesting to me.
I also like to see the point of views of other people who policed back in the days of the historical events.
Classroom extensions: 1. See if the kids know about any holidays that take place because of a historical event that happened.
2. Have the students write down a historical holiday that they know of because of the event that happened.
3. Have the students color a small picture book so they might get a better understanding.

This book contains some good questions about where we are as a nation and what we are making priorities by how we spend our money and how we excercise force with our military might. This was written before president Obama took office. Several things that were blamed on Republicans or neo-cons are still things that are practiced by the current administration. But there was some discussion on how some things have stayed the same. The government keeps getting bigger and Americans seem to keep on believing that we are an exceptional nation that makes the rules that the rest of the world needs to follow. We are spending and consuming our way into oblivion.

He discusses how the military sees war currently and how the view has changed since WWII and since Vietnam and how the nation's view of what war means has changed. This included discussion on how we have rejected the draft as a means to create a citizen army and how we now depend on a professional fighting force. It is easier politically to send a professional force into war than it is to convince the country that drafting people away from their normal lives is appropriate.

The military does not plan to win wars. We win battles and topple regimes but we stayed in Iraq and Afganistan this time with no military plan to win. He was fairly critical of Gen Tommy Franks (commander who was in charge of invading Iraq and Afganistan) and his failure to plan beyong beating the convential forces we attacked.

In his summation chapter he deals with two ideas I didn't feel he really discussed earlier on that I disagree with. One was nuclear disarmement. He wants the US to totally get rid of all our nukes and states "Furthermore, the day is approaching when the United States will be able to deter other nuclear-armed states, like Russia and China, without itself relying on nuclear weapons." He goes on to talk about how precision munitions are better. He also makes an offhand comment about how America was not justified in using the atom bomb to end the war with Japan. I completely disagree. More nations are getting access to the bomb and giving up this option leaves us at the mercy of their threats unless we strike as soon as they threaten.

The other idea was that we needed to end our dependence on energy sources outside our borders and to do this we need to end global warming. I'm not convinced these two things tie together really well.


A retired army Colonel, the author's son was US Army Lieutenant killed in action in 2007. There are many negative comments about the direction our country is going. Some of these come off as reasoned and some of them are reasonable. However, I have to wonder how much of his view on this subject is informed by the fact that his son died fighting to support our efforts in the middle east.

( )

We Americans are in denial. as long as they insist that the power of the USA is without limits, they will continue to guzzle imported oil, binge on imports, dream imperial dreams. We will ignore the necessity of settling accounts, the budget, debt, and consumption as politicians (both parties) erode military might on unnecessary and winnable wars. We will continue to allow officials responsible for failed policies to dodge accountability. Are we willfully self-destructive? It often seems so. Bacevich analyzes the more dangerous national myths that currently (mis)guide American policy.

"The United States today finds itself threatened by three interlocking crises. The first of the crises is economic and cultural, the second political, and the third military. All three share this characteristic: They are of our own making."

Concerned about the direction the US is headed? You need to read this book. ( )

The Limits of Power is Andrew Bacevich’s (justly) acclaimed The New American Militarism distilled, streamlined, and rebalanced. It is a fiercer, angrier book than its predecessor—one that spends proportionally less time outlining the problem and more calling on the nation and its leaders to wake up and implement a solution.

The problem is the same one outlined in Militarism: An unsustainable state of perpetual war driven by a misguided ambition to remake the world in America’s image and so ensure a steady flow of the cheap petroleum to which we, as a society, have become addicted. Here, more than in Militarism, Bacevich points to the decades between 1960 and 1980 as the pivotal moment when the United States abandoned fiscal discipline and personal responsibility in favor of a culture of mindless consumerism, and an awareness of the human cost of war for a fantasy that technology could make it cheap and easy. What we sowed then, we have been reaping ever since, in Beirut and Mogdishu, Kabul and Baghdad. The solution, he concludes, is for the United States to grow up, abandon its delusions, and—recognizing that a perpetual war footing is not sustainable—re-learn the meaning of sacrifice.

Preference for this presentation of the argument over the one in Militarism will be, for the most part, a matter of rhetorical taste. The former book is, to use an oversimplified analogy, condensed lecture course in the history of American foreign policy; this one is a radically extended op-ed essay. The former offers more depth and nuance, this one has a clearer through-line and passion in sufficient quantities to edge it toward “jeremiad” territory. Read Militarism for depth of understanding it promotes, or Limits for material to enliven your next impromptu political argument, or both . . . either way, though, read Bacevich. ( )

This short book by Andrew Bacevich deserves close attention from everyone concerned about the direction our country has been traveling. He dissects root causes and incompetence ruthlessly and reasonably, which is just what a new Administration and Congress need to read. ( )