I like Carl Jung’s work and find him quite intriguing. Unfortunately, I had a hard time staying engaged with this book. There were aspects that were interesting, but it was mostly pretty complex for my taste. ( )

Dense. Good thing I keep a dream journal!

Wenn ich dieses Buch als Gutachterin bekommen hätte, hätte ich es zurückgewiesen. Es ist unstrukturiert, schlecht geschrieben, man kann kaum folgen (und ich lese viele wissenschaftliche Texte, auch von Jungs Zeitgenossen). Schade, denn ich finde Jungs Theorie der Archetypen durchaus interessant und bedenkenswert.
Aber etwas mehr Struktur und Gliederung hätte diesen Aufsätzen gut getan. ( )

What kind of a book is this? I considered several categories from spiritual to supernatural, but decided that it was a sort of mythology of human archetypes and the psyche. My difficulties with the text came close to my experience reading the Tao of Lao-tse, while in its categorical nature it resembled The Varieties of Religious Experience. My own approach to reading it centered on the literary connections with which I found resonance in the text. These ranged widely from Shakespeare to Stevenson and Hesse with a special emphasis on the importance of Jung for Moby-Dick.

In this work Jung propounds many of his theories regarding the nature of human consciousness, both personal and collective. While portrayed as scientific they seemed to lack the evidence normally associated with the scientific method. Jung was great at making his assumptions sound like settled truth, when outside of his coterie there was little that was settled. For example, he compares his discoveries to the discovery of the atom, commenting that "we speak of "atoms" today because we have heard, directly or indirectly, of the atomic theory of Democritus. But where did Democritus, or whoever first spoke of minimal constitutive elements, hear of atoms? This notion had its origin in archetypal ideas, that is , in primordial images which were never reflections of physical events but are spontaneous products of the psychic factor." (p 57) This gives you a flavor of the sort of arguments presented. There are also examples of many of the concepts based on observation of patients. For me, it was these stories that hearkened back to the approach of William James.
http://pics.cdn.librarything.com/pics/s-s.gif
The book is poetic at times and has a wealth of interpretations of psychic events. His examinations of the personal or collective unconscious is fascinating and provides a great introduction to the psychological world of Carl Jung. ( )

Librería 3. Estante 2