Pagina principaleGruppiConversazioniAltroStatistiche
Cerca nel Sito
Questo sito utilizza i cookies per fornire i nostri servizi, per migliorare le prestazioni, per analisi, e (per gli utenti che accedono senza fare login) per la pubblicità. Usando LibraryThing confermi di aver letto e capito le nostre condizioni di servizio e la politica sulla privacy. Il tuo uso del sito e dei servizi è soggetto a tali politiche e condizioni.

Risultati da Google Ricerca Libri

Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.

Sto caricando le informazioni...

Existentialism is a Humanism

di Jean-Paul Sartre

UtentiRecensioniPopolaritàMedia votiConversazioni
570541,872 (3.63)Nessuno
"It was to correct common misconceptions about his thought that Sartre accepted an invitation to speak on October 29, 1945, at the Club Maintenant in Paris. The unstated objective of his lecture ("Existentialism Is a Humanism") was to expound his philosophy as a form of "existentialism," a term much bandied about at the time. Sartre asserted that existentialism was essentially a doctrine for philosophers, though, ironically, he was about to make it accessible to a general audience. The published text of his lecture quickly became one of the bibles of existentialism and made Sartre an international celebrity. The idea of freedom occupies the center of Sartre's doctrine. Man, born into an empty, godless universe, is nothing to begin with. He creates his essence - his self, his being - through the choices he freely makes ("existence precedes essence"). Were it not for the contingency of his death, he would never end. Choosing to be this or that is to affirm the value of what we choose. In choosing, therefore, we commit not only ourselves but all of mankind. This edition of Existentialism Is a Humanism is a translation of the 1996 French edition, which includes Arlette Elkaim-Sartre's introduction and a Q & A with Sartre about his lecture. Paired with "Existentialism Is a Humanism" is another seminal Sartre text, his commentary on Camus's The Stranger. In her foreword, intended for an American audience, acclaimed Sartre biographer Annie Cohen-Solal offers an assessment of both works"--Jacket.… (altro)
Nessuno
Sto caricando le informazioni...

Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro.

Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro.

Mostra 5 di 5
Proof that Existentialism isn't meant for lazy emo boys lol. Hopelessness refers to accepting the things you can't control, abandonment refers to the lack of god through modernity that provides us subjectivity and free will, and despair is the necessity of action.

This is meant for, like, punks lol. Take your pick: mohawk, beatnik, poem corner, just whatever kind of punk that doesn't follow everyone's rules.
  AvANvN | Mar 27, 2023 |
I cannot discover any truth whatsoever about myself except through the mediation of another. The other is essential to my existence, as well as to the knowledge I have of myself. Under these conditions, my intimate discovery of myself is at the same time a revelation of the other as a freedom that confronts my own and that cannot think or will without doing so for or against me. We are thus immediately thrust into a world that we may call "intersubjectivity." It is in this world that man decides what he is and what others are.

I have to admit that—at least insofar as it is laid out here—existentialism is an unconvincing philosophical position. While it is easy to get swept away in Sartre's rhetoric, the theory makes more sense as an analysis of a particular psychology rather than a metaphysical state of existence. ( )
  drbrand | Dec 20, 2021 |
Sartre will never be my favorite philosopher, but he's a great scratching post--pretty good at criticizing others, very good at diagnosing social malaise, solid enough at saying how he wishes thing are, but just awful at making those three things hang together in any coherent way. When he tries to bring it together, it's mostly just a smushing of Kant, Heidegger, Hegel, Nietzsche and others, with an unfortunate attempt to keep hold of human nature theorizing under a different guise. On the upside, Sartre gives us gems like this:

"Obviously, I do not mean that when I choose between a cream pastry and a chocolate eclair, I am choosing in anguish."

Speak for yourself, JP. ( )
  stillatim | Oct 23, 2020 |
I read this as a warm up to reading Being and Nothingness (wish me luck!). A very simplified summary of Sartre's thoughts provided by Sartre himself. Reading this you can just tell that any subtleness of his thought is left unspoken in order to just get the main ideas across, but it felt valuable enough as a taster. Truthfully I preferred his review of Camus's The Stranger more than the lecture on his own thinking. You can taste Sartre's excitement at this work and how it engaged and beguiled him. And also understand why they were immediately drawn to each other until that friendship eventually went to hell. ( )
  23Goatboy23 | Jan 17, 2020 |
I hated this book the first time I read it (probably because I had to rush through it to read for a class and understood almost nothing in it). If it could be read at my own pace without a prof breathing down my neck to write a paper on it I think it would be a lot more enjoyable. ( )
  nrodri329 | Jun 16, 2018 |
Mostra 5 di 5
nessuna recensione | aggiungi una recensione
Devi effettuare l'accesso per contribuire alle Informazioni generali.
Per maggiori spiegazioni, vedi la pagina di aiuto delle informazioni generali.
Titolo canonico
Dati dalle informazioni generali inglesi. Modifica per tradurlo nella tua lingua.
Titolo originale
Titoli alternativi
Data della prima edizione
Personaggi
Luoghi significativi
Eventi significativi
Film correlati
Epigrafe
Dedica
Incipit
Citazioni
Ultime parole
Nota di disambiguazione
Redattore editoriale
Elogi
Lingua originale
DDC/MDS Canonico
LCC canonico

Risorse esterne che parlano di questo libro

Wikipedia in inglese

Nessuno

"It was to correct common misconceptions about his thought that Sartre accepted an invitation to speak on October 29, 1945, at the Club Maintenant in Paris. The unstated objective of his lecture ("Existentialism Is a Humanism") was to expound his philosophy as a form of "existentialism," a term much bandied about at the time. Sartre asserted that existentialism was essentially a doctrine for philosophers, though, ironically, he was about to make it accessible to a general audience. The published text of his lecture quickly became one of the bibles of existentialism and made Sartre an international celebrity. The idea of freedom occupies the center of Sartre's doctrine. Man, born into an empty, godless universe, is nothing to begin with. He creates his essence - his self, his being - through the choices he freely makes ("existence precedes essence"). Were it not for the contingency of his death, he would never end. Choosing to be this or that is to affirm the value of what we choose. In choosing, therefore, we commit not only ourselves but all of mankind. This edition of Existentialism Is a Humanism is a translation of the 1996 French edition, which includes Arlette Elkaim-Sartre's introduction and a Q & A with Sartre about his lecture. Paired with "Existentialism Is a Humanism" is another seminal Sartre text, his commentary on Camus's The Stranger. In her foreword, intended for an American audience, acclaimed Sartre biographer Annie Cohen-Solal offers an assessment of both works"--Jacket.

Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche

Descrizione del libro
Riassunto haiku

Discussioni correnti

Nessuno

Copertine popolari

Link rapidi

Voto

Media: (3.63)
0.5
1 4
1.5
2 6
2.5 1
3 26
3.5 4
4 30
4.5 1
5 19

Sei tu?

Diventa un autore di LibraryThing.

 

A proposito di | Contatto | LibraryThing.com | Privacy/Condizioni d'uso | Guida/FAQ | Blog | Negozio | APIs | TinyCat | Biblioteche di personaggi celebri | Recensori in anteprima | Informazioni generali | 204,763,964 libri! | Barra superiore: Sempre visibile