Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.
Sto caricando le informazioni... Running on Emptiness: The Pathology of Civilization (edizione 2008)di John Zerzan
Informazioni sull'operaRunning on Emptiness: The Pathology of Civilization di John Zerzan Nessuno Sto caricando le informazioni...
Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro. Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro. Sisällyksestä: Introduction, by Theresa Kintz; Running on Emptiness: the Failure of Symbolic Thought; Time and Its Discontents; Against Technology; That Thing We Do; Enemy of the State; Abstract Expressionism: Painting as Vision and Critique; The Age of Nihilism; Postscript to Future Primitive re the Transition; Age of Grief; In Memoriam; Why I Hate Star Trek; PBS, Power, and Postmodernism; Who is Chomsky?; “Hakim Bey,” Postmodern “Anarchist”; City of Light; We All Live in Waco; Whose Unabomber?; Domestication News; We Have to Dismantle All This; He Means it. Do You?; How Ruinous Does It Have to Get? How Postmodernism Greases the Rails; So…How Did You Become an Anarchist? No Way Out? nessuna recensione | aggiungi una recensione
America's most famous anarchist. Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche |
Discussioni correntiNessunoCopertine popolari
Google Books — Sto caricando le informazioni... GeneriSistema Decimale Melvil (DDC)320Social sciences Political Science Political ScienceClassificazione LCVotoMedia:
Sei tu?Diventa un autore di LibraryThing. |
I disagreed of course with Zerzan's ad hominem attack on Chomsky; it's fine to take issue with his linguistic theories--I do as well, and for reasons not dissimilar to Zerzan's. It's also okay to disagree on fundamentals about Chomsky's degree of commitment to anarchism and its ideals, although I'd point out that Noam has written and spoken about his anarchism as an ideal achievable only after a profound spiritual transformation of humanity--which is what Zerzan himself suggests is necessary. Criticizing Chomsky as a phony anarchist because he's currently for strengthening the federal government makes sense--there is a ring of 'dictatorship of the proletariat' about the idea--but in the face of an unprecedented assault on human rights by corporate power, it's not completely wrong-headed to suggest a strengthening of the one institution that can protect us from pillage.
Zerzan says Chomsky doesn't give a shit about women's rights or minority rights or the environment because he focuses on foreign policy; this displays complete ignorance of Chomsky's writings and speeches. Chomsky focuses on foreign policy because it's the area where most Americans are most deluded about our true role in the world, but civil and human rights and women's rights are always primary in his books, as is environmental degradation. I'm sure there are many anarchists who regard Zerzan as a poseur because he doesn't loft bombs at Bill Gates. ( )