Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.
Sto caricando le informazioni... I Maia (1888)di José Maria Eça de Queiroz
Sto caricando le informazioni...
Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro. Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro. “Porque não se deixaria o preto sossegado, na calma posse dos seus manipansos? Que mal fazia à ordem das coisas que houvesse selvagens? Pelo contrário, davam ao universo uma deliciosa quantidade de pitoresco”. (My loose translation: “Why couldn't the Black be left alone, in the calm possession of his charms? What harm did it do to the order of things that there were savages? On the contrary, they gave the universe a delicious amount of the picturesque”) In “Os Maias” by Eça de Queiroz I’ve just re-read “Os Maias” because I read somewhere in the Portuguese press it had racist “undertones”. Let me get this out of the way first: I have a personal moral obligation to not be racist, as well as a personal inclination. I do not have a moral obligation to erase history because someone says that they find it offensive. I'm not arguing that just because it happened a long time ago it is harmless or that I approve, just that history is there to be learned from and you cannot do that if you sanitize it into oblivion. I just believe that history and fiction in particular is a "warts and all" thing, you have to show the nasty stuff and doing so does not in any way imply that you agree with the opinions and mores of the time under study. Having said that, overreaction effectively gives genuine racists a get out, painting any one who complains about racism as hysterically oversensitive and prone to grandstanding. Moreover, free speech only needs to be defended when someone says something that is controversial, or offensive, or utterly disgusting. The fact that you personally find something offensive is not reason enough to ban it. And banning things has nothing to do with free speech. The principle of free speech is the bedrock of democracy, allowing criticism and new ideas to flourish in society, and it is far more important than any individual's sensibilities. If you start to declare all literature depicting racism as racist, then you immediately include all anti-racist literature in that category- it's virtually impossible to condemn racism without depicting it. “To Kill a Mockingbird” depicts racism. Toni Morrison's Beloved depicts racism. Primo Levi's “If This Is a Man” depicts racism. Are these anti-racist works to be derided as racist for simply depicting the horrors they condemn? Bottom-line: No, “Os Maias” is not a racist novel ffs! It's fiction, you stupid tossers! Passa-se um drama familiar logo no comecinho. Depois disso nada acontece por umas seiscentas páginas - os personagens visitam-se, tomam chá, jogam cartas, ocasionalmente há um affair, mas nada de substantivo. Centenas de páginas de diálogos chatíssimos e descrições desnecessárias. Lá pelo final passa-se outro drama familiar. E é isso. Eça de Queiroz retrata-nos, nesta obra, um largo fresco da sociedade portuguesa. Como observa lucidamente Helena Cidade Moura, em Carlos da Maia, «uma educação exemplar não o liberta do peso da hereditariedade social. Personagens de um grande mundo, os netos de Afonso da Maia, vivificados e alimentados pela "grande civilização europeia" caem, apesar de tudo, ali numa rua ao Chiado». nessuna recensione | aggiungi una recensione
Appartiene alle Collane EditorialiColecção História da Literatura (Livro 10) Premi e riconoscimentiElenchi di rilievo
The Maias depicts the declining fortunes of a landowning family over three generations as they are gradually undermined by hypocrisy, complacency and sexual licence. Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche |
Discussioni correntiNessunoCopertine popolari
Google Books — Sto caricando le informazioni... GeneriSistema Decimale Melvil (DDC)869.33Literature Spanish and Portuguese Portuguese Portuguese fiction 19th CenturyClassificazione LCVotoMedia:
Sei tu?Diventa un autore di LibraryThing. |
(My other very sad comment: I read the translation by Margaret Jull Costa. Her work, as always, is impeccable. But her publisher—New Directions—did her and the readers a grave disservice by publishing the book with no supporting information. In some books, I would not need a glossary, but when an author describes his characters’ methods of transportation in excruciating detail (at least six different terms—I stopped counting—for their carriages: calèche, phaeton, dog-cart, four-in-hand…), when amounts of money are important and often used to make a point but the reader has no sense of relative value, the publisher owes it to readers to explain these things. This book had nothing: no notes, no glossary, no introduction (though a brief “appreciation” at the end by Jull Costa), nothing. De Queirós made these distinctions and wrote as he did with a purpose. But when the reader cannot decipher them, I think a publisher actually harms the work by not helping with notes or explanations. Too often I spent time hunting information down because it seemed too important to just pass by. And like War and Peace, a list of characters wouldn’t hurt.) ( )