I believe that I had not heard of Joseph Roth until I read a book earlier this year about artistic types spending a summer in Ostend in 1936. I read it because it featured Stefan Zweig and because I am generally interested in learning about Europe during that time. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/28364718-summer-before-the-dark?ref=nav_sb_s...

I saw a new translation of this novel waiting for me on the new acquisitions shelf at the local library. Since it is short, I figured that I didn't have much to lose by giving it a try. I'm glad I did.

The book presents a vivid portrait of life in Europe after WW1 from the point of view of a disabled veteran of WW1. The writing is excellent, the sentences just flow on the page. Now I'll have to read Roth's book The Radetzky March, which seems to be considered his best work.

I'm surprised to see that of the 224 reviews of this book here on Goodreads, 145 of them are written in Persian. I wonder what the story is behind that. ( )

This is the 11th book by Joseph Roth I have read, not counting the short stories and feuilletons. Here they are ranked -loosely - from 1 to 11:

The Radetzky March
Job
Weights and Measures
The String of Pearls
Rebellion
The Legend of the Holy Drinker
Hotel Savoy
Zipper and his Father
The Silent Prophet
The Emperor's Tomb
The Spiders Web

Roth is always worth reading. Even in the less successful books, the ones that he dashed off in a hurry when he was short of cash, there are the most surprising insights and beautiful turns of phrase waiting around every corner. ( )

http://www.mytwostotinki.com/?p=911

Joseph Roth is nowadays mostly known as a literary fiction writer but in the 1920s and early 1930s his reputation as one of the most prolific journalists was outshining even his fame as a novelist. To those who want to get to know the full Roth, I recommend therefore his journalistic work; frequently he touches issues in his articles that he later on used as material or inspiration for his literary prose.

Roth was best when it came to social issues, to the living conditions of the ordinary, mostly poor population of Austria, Germany, France, and the other countries he visited. He wrote for example several long pieces for the Frankfurter Zeitung and the socialist Vorwärts about the fate and the living conditions of the crippled and physically handicapped ex-soldiers of WWI - if you know the artwork of Otto Dix or George Grosz you know how terribly millions of men were mutilated for the rest of their mostly miserable lives.

One such victim of WWI is Andreas Pum, the central figure of Rebellion, the novel that was also first printed in Vorwärts before a book edition was published. Andreas lost a leg in the war, but he seems strangely happy. Not only has he survived, he also got a medal (one of those pieces of metal that governments are quick to hand out) and a license to play a barrel organ and so he can make a living from the few coins he gets from the people listening to his repertoire. To him that is fair enough.

Andreas is a simple, uneducated man. He doesn't reflect his situation and those war cripples that complain about their fate or the lack of support from the government, he considers as malingerers and thieves. Andreas is at this stage the complete negation of the rebel. He just wishes to improve his life a bit and to have a wife and family. A good fate - so it seems to Andreas - sends him a widow whose plump forms attract him and soon he moves in to the widow's house and can enjoy the life of a husband. He loves the widow's daughter like his own child and even for Muli, the small donkey that carries his barrel organ, he has tender and friendly feelings. Andreas is a kind man.

Everything could be perfect for Andreas, but one day he is being insulted by a rude passenger in the tram, one word gives another and the verbal argument is followed by physical violence. A policeman is soon on the scene and Andreas will be held responsible by the court for his violent behavior. How Andreas becomes - just by coincidence and certain unpredictable events in combination with the vileness of the public organs such as the police - a victim of a system that always holds people like Andreas down, shows Joseph Roth's mastery and also his sympathy with people like Andreas, who are always the victims. And who usually even don't remark it.

To read how Andreas is going through a real ordeal is depressing; although he is just 45 years old, he looks with his completely white hair already like a very old man; but the more he is physically degrading, the more conscious he becomes about his real situation, the more he becomes a rebel - a person who disagrees with the order of things.

When I read the book, I realized that there were certain elements you can find also in most other of Roth's novels and long stories: the main character slips down like on an inclined plane, the physical degradation corresponds with an awakening in terms of self-consciousness and acts of rebellion (like not praying to God anymore), and the tone of the narrative is always close to the legend. The similarities to Job and Legend of a Holy Drinker in this respect are particularly stunning.

Rebellion might not be the best novel of Joseph Roth, but I found it well written and touching. For those who are familiar with Roth's oeuvre it will be particularly interesting how in this early work he prefigured many topics and tropes that he was also using in his most mature works of the late 1920s and 1930s. ( )

Ma dio era ancora dio se poteva sbagliarsi? ( )

De oorlogsveteraan Andreas Pum zal met één been en een vergunning om met een draaiorgeltje op straat te mogen venten, invulling aan zijn leven moeten geven. Aanvankelijk lukt dat redelijk. Hij huwt en meent de harmonie in zijn bestaan gevonden te hebben. Tot het moment dat de altijd brave en volgzame Pum door een hautaine medeburger gebrualiseerd wordt. Dat is het moment dat de schellen van zijn ogen vallen en hij zicht krijgt op al het onrecht dat hij aan den lijve moet ondervinden.
En dan komt het einde van het boek in zicht, maar niet nadat de man uitvoerig aan het woord komt met een aanklacht tegen de godheid die dat alles mogelijk maak. Zijn rebellie begint met de woorden: ‘uit mijn vrome deemoed ben ik ontwaakt tot rode, rebelse koppigheid. Ik zou u graag verloochenen, God, als ik in leven was en niet voor u stond. Maar omdat ik u met mijn eigen ogen zie en met mijn eigen oren hoor, moet ik een groter kwaad doen dan u te verloochenen: ik moet u beschimpen !…………….. En dan begint de aanklacht waarmee het boek eindigt, die bladzijden zijn om voor te lezen en ze in te lijsten.
‘Ik wil uw genade niet ! Stuur mij naar de hel.’

Misschien niet origineel maar wel een parel van vertelkunst. ( )