Questo sito utilizza i cookies per fornire i nostri servizi, per migliorare le prestazioni, per analisi, e (per gli utenti che accedono senza fare login) per la pubblicità. Usando LibraryThing confermi di aver letto e capito le nostre condizioni di servizio e la politica sulla privacy. Il tuo uso del sito e dei servizi è soggetto a tali politiche e condizioni.
Risultati da Google Ricerca Libri
Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.
Faulty teaching about men and women has infiltrated the church. Miller examines historical influences that have led to today's confusion—moving beyond authority and submission to equally important biblical themes.
Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro.
▾Conversazioni (Su link)
Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro.
▾Recensioni di utenti
In this book, Rachel Miller attempts to chart a "third way" between Complementarianism and Egalitarianism when it comes to gender roles. She attempts to chart how men and women ought to relate in marriage, church, and society, in a way that she claims is true to Scripture.
Unfortunately, one is hard pressed to find actual interaction with the biblical text in her book. Where found, her attempted interactions with the biblical text are egalitarian interpretations. When studied, she continually misquotes her sources, misrepresents her opponents, and misrepresents history. Besides men-only ordination, there is almost nothing there that is not congruent with egalitarianism at all.
The book promotes social egalitarianism while having a minimalistic ecclesial complementarianism. It would be a better book if it was more honest about its own position, more honest about citing and representing opponents, and more honest about actual interactions of the biblical text. An open egalitarian book would be much better than this deceitful book. ( )
Dati dalle informazioni generali inglesi.Modifica per tradurlo nella tua lingua.
For Matt, my strongest emcourgement-- yesterday, today, and forever.
My beloved is mine, and I am his." (Song 2:16)
And for Jonathan, Gabriel and Nathanael"-- God has given me the desires of my heart.
He gives the barren woman a home, making her the joyous mother of children (Ps. 113:9 ESV)
Incipit
Dati dalle informazioni generali inglesi.Modifica per tradurlo nella tua lingua.
[Forward] Rachel Miller is the perfect person to write this timely book that challenges the lens that many in the church use to view the nature of men and women and their so-called roles in the church, home, and society.
[Introduction] Over the years, my parents have renovated several homes.
Imagine you re in World War II Germany.
[Conclusion] We all inherit something from our families.
Citazioni
Ultime parole
Dati dalle informazioni generali inglesi.Modifica per tradurlo nella tua lingua.
[Foreword] I commend this book to you as a valuable contribution to the continuing discussion on the nature, relationships, and value of men and women, with the expectation that it will be a catalyst for fruitful, biblical reform.
[Conclusion] My hope is that individuals, marriages, churches, and societies will be strengthened and that God will be glorified in all our relationships.
Faulty teaching about men and women has infiltrated the church. Miller examines historical influences that have led to today's confusion—moving beyond authority and submission to equally important biblical themes.
Unfortunately, one is hard pressed to find actual interaction with the biblical text in her book. Where found, her attempted interactions with the biblical text are egalitarian interpretations. When studied, she continually misquotes her sources, misrepresents her opponents, and misrepresents history. Besides men-only ordination, there is almost nothing there that is not congruent with egalitarianism at all.
The book promotes social egalitarianism while having a minimalistic ecclesial complementarianism. It would be a better book if it was more honest about its own position, more honest about citing and representing opponents, and more honest about actual interactions of the biblical text. An open egalitarian book would be much better than this deceitful book. ( )