Pagina principaleGruppiConversazioniAltroStatistiche
Cerca nel Sito
Questo sito utilizza i cookies per fornire i nostri servizi, per migliorare le prestazioni, per analisi, e (per gli utenti che accedono senza fare login) per la pubblicità. Usando LibraryThing confermi di aver letto e capito le nostre condizioni di servizio e la politica sulla privacy. Il tuo uso del sito e dei servizi è soggetto a tali politiche e condizioni.

Risultati da Google Ricerca Libri

Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.

Sto caricando le informazioni...

Nemesis

di Bill Napier

UtentiRecensioniPopolaritàMedia votiCitazioni
2634101,212 (2.92)2
CIA listening posts have detected evidence of an extraordinary operation by cosmonauts of the resurgent and aggressive Russian regime - a plan to deflect a giant asteroid into a collision course with the United States. The result would be unimaginable devastation, and the West's top astrophysicists are secretly assembled to try and find a way of averting total disaster. But the key to finding the asteroid is a suprising one - its course was predicted in an obscure Renaissance manuscript, the only copy of which has now gone mysteriously missing...… (altro)
Nessuno
Sto caricando le informazioni...

Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro.

Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro.

» Vedi le 2 citazioni

Mostra 4 di 4
Nach gut einem Viertel abgebrochen. das Buch ist eher für Leute die schon Physik in der Schule toll fanden.
Dazu gehörte ich definitiv nicht. Seitenweise wissenschaftliches Geschwafel, null Spannung und sautrocken. ( )
  truller10 | Aug 31, 2015 |
I don't usually read thrillers, but this one really held my interest. The real question this book poses is: Who and what can we trust? What do we know - or do we just think we know it?

I did not find the technical jargon off-putting. Maybe I read more science than the other reviewers, maybe I am better at reading past things I don't understand if they are not necessary to the plot. In hindsight I think that the technical language is supposed to be somewhat overpowering. What I did find troubling was the feeling from early on that details weren't quite right. Again, I think now that this was deliberate.

There is a lot more going on in this book than I expected when I started it. ( )
  MarthaJeanne | Aug 19, 2011 |
This was a new author for me. I found the book hard to get into what with all of the technical jargon. Even with the plot twist at the end, I don't think I will read any more books by this author. ( )
  TomWheaton | Aug 13, 2011 |
I generally give books 100 pages before I decide to finish them. “Nemesis,” kept my attention on and off, but there were many times where I’d see how many pages I had to go before finishing, wishing I’d decided to put it down earlier. It’s not a bad book, but could have been shorter and much less convoluted.

Clearly its author, Bill Napier is a smart guy. And while it’s OK to have technical dialogue, mathematic formulas, etc., he really pushes the limit. He needs to read Crichton to get an understanding of the balance between too much techno-jargon and layman’s terms. Crichton always seemed to include a character that didn’t understand the technical goings on, so it would be explained so the rest of us would understand too. Napier goes for a too realistic scene where little is explained…until later…maybe.

This team of scientists are basically trying to identify an asteroid they believe has been forced off course by Russians into hitting America. The President has given them a deadline to identify the asteroid and come up with a plan to divert it from hitting Earth. Along the way, many of these individuals seem to be in no real hurry to find the answers. And Napier has this annoying habit of dropping you into a scene with no preamble. So it takes several pages before you realize where/when you are and what’s going on.

I think the core idea of this book, in the hands of someone like Crichton (well, he’s of course dead, but you know what I mean) would have been much better.

But then, that’s what you get when you buy a book for $1.25 at Dollar General… ( )
  Jarratt | Oct 21, 2010 |
Mostra 4 di 4
nessuna recensione | aggiungi una recensione
Devi effettuare l'accesso per contribuire alle Informazioni generali.
Per maggiori spiegazioni, vedi la pagina di aiuto delle informazioni generali.
Titolo canonico
Titolo originale
Titoli alternativi
Data della prima edizione
Personaggi
Luoghi significativi
Eventi significativi
Film correlati
Epigrafe
Dedica
Incipit
Citazioni
Ultime parole
Nota di disambiguazione
Redattore editoriale
Elogi
Lingua originale
DDC/MDS Canonico
LCC canonico

Risorse esterne che parlano di questo libro

Wikipedia in inglese (1)

CIA listening posts have detected evidence of an extraordinary operation by cosmonauts of the resurgent and aggressive Russian regime - a plan to deflect a giant asteroid into a collision course with the United States. The result would be unimaginable devastation, and the West's top astrophysicists are secretly assembled to try and find a way of averting total disaster. But the key to finding the asteroid is a suprising one - its course was predicted in an obscure Renaissance manuscript, the only copy of which has now gone mysteriously missing...

Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche

Descrizione del libro
Riassunto haiku

Discussioni correnti

Nessuno

Copertine popolari

Link rapidi

Voto

Media: (2.92)
0.5 1
1 2
1.5
2 5
2.5 1
3 9
3.5
4 6
4.5
5 2

Sei tu?

Diventa un autore di LibraryThing.

 

A proposito di | Contatto | LibraryThing.com | Privacy/Condizioni d'uso | Guida/FAQ | Blog | Negozio | APIs | TinyCat | Biblioteche di personaggi celebri | Recensori in anteprima | Informazioni generali | 204,756,060 libri! | Barra superiore: Sempre visibile