Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.
|
Sto caricando le informazioni... Reputation: What It Is and Why It Matters (edizione 2017)di Gloria Origgi (Autore), Stephen Holmes (Traduttore), Noga Arikha (Traduttore)
Informazioni sull'operaReputation: What It Is and Why It Matters di Gloria Origgi    Nessuno Sto caricando le informazioni...
 Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro. Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro.  DavidWineberg | Sep 11, 2017 | 
"Of the two books, _Reputation_ is the funnier and the more serious. Origgi is ravenous for insights whatever their provenance, and her book is a giddy blend of cross-disciplinary perspectives. Reputation can be recondite – it includes sentences such as: “Thus, just as ontogeny does not recapitulate phylogeny, so ontology does not recapitulate philology.” (I mean, duh.) But it mixes crunchy intellectual provocations with literary allusions, catty takes on academic life and some juicy riffs, including one on why Origgi’s highly educated friends invest magical powers in certain doctors. "
A compelling exploration of how reputation affects every aspect of contemporary life Reputation touches almost everything, guiding our behavior and choices in countless ways. But it is also shrouded in mystery. Why is it so powerful when the criteria by which people and things are defined as good or bad often appear to be arbitrary? Why do we care so much about how others see us that we may even do irrational and harmful things to try to influence their opinion? In this engaging book, Gloria Origgi draws on philosophy, social psychology, sociology, economics, literature, and history to offer an illuminating account of an important yet oddly neglected subject. Compellingly written and filled with surprising insights, Reputation pins down an elusive subject that affects us all. Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche |
Discussioni correntiNessunoCopertine popolari  
 Google Books — Sto caricando le informazioni...GeneriSistema Decimale Melvil (DDC)303.4833Social sciences Social Sciences; Sociology and anthropology Social Processes Social change Causes of change Development of science and technology Communication, information technologyClassificazione LCVotoMedia: (3.75)
Sei tu?Diventa un autore di LibraryThing. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1
It seems that if you study reputation long enough, you come to the conclusion that it does not exist. Reputation is all in your head. It is what you believe others think of you because of how you present yourself and possibly what you (claim to) have done in the past. On this tissue of subterfuge rests reputation. The Latin word “persona“ means mask.
Gloria Origgi has done a fine job of thinking this through, from most conceivable angles. Not only does she account for gossip and rumor, but the human condition and the need for esteem if not immortality. She examines wine raters, academic publishing and ebay feedback as well as charlatans and frauds (though oddly, she doesn’t examine Linked In, the ultimate dedicated reputation site).
Ironically, despite all her citations of studies and references to other scientists’ work, Origgi fills her book with examples from fiction. From films to books to plays and operas, almost all of her points are illustrated through imaginary people doing imaginary things that harm or enhance their imaginary reputations.
Reputation reminds me of homo economicus, a theoretical construct of a rational being, always making the right decision. He does not exist, but there is a huge body of work that requires and depends on him. So with Reputation, a theoretical construct drawing on angles and aspects of society, with very little recourse to the way the world works. I half expected a mathematical formula to appear. In the real world, everyone is trying to get ahead. They will say and do whatever it takes, rightly or wrongly, morally or immorally. For some, even a terrible reputation is preferable to none (which Origgi does not contemplate).
Possibly the most rational conclusion Origgi comes to is that reputation is a necessary feedback loop. Like musicians onstage, we need to hear and see what others are hearing and seeing to know how we’re doing and adjust for greater acceptance.
As Origgi says early on, there is very little in the way of deep research on reputation. It is an emerging topic that needs argument. This will be the baseline.
David Wineberg (