Pagina principaleGruppiConversazioniAltroStatistiche
Cerca nel Sito
Questo sito utilizza i cookies per fornire i nostri servizi, per migliorare le prestazioni, per analisi, e (per gli utenti che accedono senza fare login) per la pubblicità. Usando LibraryThing confermi di aver letto e capito le nostre condizioni di servizio e la politica sulla privacy. Il tuo uso del sito e dei servizi è soggetto a tali politiche e condizioni.

Risultati da Google Ricerca Libri

Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.

Sto caricando le informazioni...

Paul: Follower of Jesus or Founder of Christianity?

di David Wenham

UtentiRecensioniPopolaritàMedia votiCitazioni
2083129,247 (4.14)1
Nessuno
Sto caricando le informazioni...

Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro.

Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro.

» Vedi 1 citazione

Mostra 3 di 3
Summary: A study of the relationship of Pauline thought to the teachings of Jesus by a comprehensive effort to compare them on a number of major themes.

One of the more discussed questions in Pauline studies is whether Paul may be considered the real “founder” of Christianity as we know it. For one thing, Paul rarely quotes Jesus, and aside from the death and resurrection of Jesus, seems to have little interest in the ministry of Jesus. On the face of it, his teaching seems to have different concerns, everything from justification by grace through faith, the inclusion of the Gentiles, and the ordering of life in churches.

This work was brought to my attention when I reviewed Who Created Christianity, a festschrift honoring Wenham’s work. That work was not possible without this one, and I found it sufficiently interesting to dig into the work that began it all, published by Wenham back in 1995. Wenham’s project in this work was nothing less than a comprehensive comparison of the teaching of Jesus and the thought of Paul. His method, which he outlines in the first chapter is to set the teaching of Jesus and Paul side by side in six major areas in chapters two through seven. He considers that of Jesus first, and then that of Paul. This in itself reveals many areas of consonance as well as divergence. The second part of each chapter is even more important. Wenham looks for connection between Jesus and Paul, and whether this can be argued to go back to the teaching of Jesus. These may be one of the following: formal tradition indicators, where Paul indicates he is drawing upon the words of the Lord, such as in teaching on divorce in 1 Cor 7:10; references to things known by his readers that would have come from Jesus, as in 1 Thes. 5:1-2; verbal and formal similarities, such as Paul’s “yes, yes” or “no, no” in 2 Cor. 17-18, and similarities of thought.

Wenham deals with the question of correlates not demonstrating relationship. His own approach is one in which, if the accumulated evidence shows a number of highly probable or plausible connections, then it may be argued that there is a likelihood of dependence of Paul on the Jesus tradition.

In chapters two through seven, Wenham applies this method to the following:

The Kingdom of God
Who is Jesus?
Why the Crucifixion
Jesus and the Community
Living in Love
The Future Coming of the Lord

Chapter 8 takes a slightly different approach, surveying the life and ministry of Jesus, considering what Paul might have known of his birth, baptism and temptation, ministry, miracles, and lifestyle, transfiguration, passion, resurrection and exaltation.

Finally, Wenham draws together his conclusions in chapter 9, some of which I will highlight. While Paul doesn’t use kingdom language very often, he teaches that new creation, a new situation has come in Christ. Jesus speaks of himself as the Son of Man and Paul of him as the new Adam, and also uses the “Abba” language distinctive to Jesus. At the last supper, Jesus sees his suffering as redemptive and bringing in his coming kingdom and Paul sees the redemption of sinful humanity, and a strong connection in Paul’s writing about the last supper. Jesus speaks of the destruction of the temple and the community and mission of the twelve. Paul sees the new temple composed of Jews and those incorporated into the church through the Gentile mission. There is a common thread of the primacy of the law of love and a vision of the last things. Wenham also sees difference but contends that the pre-passion and resurrection setting of Jesus in a Jewish world, and the post-Pentecost, Gentile setting of Paul’s thought accounts for differences. He shows how Paul’s thought is a development rather than departure from the teaching of Jesus. He also has some intriguing ideas in a concluding note about Paul’s gospel sources in relation to the Mark, Matthew, Luke, and Q sources of synoptic scholarship.

While taking nothing away from Paul’s importance to the Gentile mission in the urbanized Roman empire, Wenham contends that “Paul would have been horrified at the suggestion that he was the founder of Christianity” (p. 409). Rather, he would consider himself a follower, indeed a “slave” of the one he encountered on the Damascus road.

This is not only a wonderful contribution to Pauline studies but also to biblical theology, in considering the continuity, indeed the origins of our Christology across the gospel. I suspect there are those who would be more skeptical of Wenham’s connections and conclusions, giving less credence to dependence upon Jesus. But what Wenham does accomplish is the removal of the wedge some would drive between Jesus and Paul, while doing full justice to the biblical material. So much of Pauline studies has been dominated by the “New Perspective” discussion which may lead to overlooking Wenham. Amid discussions that may threaten to eclipse Jesus, this work both honors Paul and exalts Christ. ( )
  BobonBooks | Jan 6, 2022 |
NO OF PAGES: 452 SUB CAT I: Paul SUB CAT II: SUB CAT III: DESCRIPTION: David Wenham has returned with new vigor to the old question of the relationship of Pauline thought to the life and teachings of Jesus. His work is the most extensive treatment of this subject currently available and as such demands the attention of every scholar even remotely interested in this subject. Wenham's well-argued case for significant unity between the Jesus and Pauline traditions needs to be heard, not least because he has made a strong case that Paul was a follower of the Christ, not a founder of Christianity.NOTES: SUBTITLE:
  BeitHallel | Feb 18, 2011 |
I have bought this book some time back, and have decided to read it in a bid to understand the arguments regarding the issue of Paul and Jesus. The author has done a good job of utilizing the evidence, textual and otherwise, to prove his conservative position on this issue, and thus show that even by the standards of modernist scholarship, a reasonably good case can be made of the essential continuity between Jesus and Paul.

What erodes the usefulness of this book and undermines its case however, is the wholesale capitulation to the prevailing "scholarly" paradigm of Modernism especially in this case Higher Criticism. The entire humanistic presuppositions behind Modernist "theo"-logy is assumed to be correct even though there is no rationale (and no proof) for why such is so. The author's case thus utilizes the Modernist hermeneutic of unbelief, instead of the Biblical hermeneutic of Sola Scriptura and the epistemic primacy of Scripture. This can be seen for example in this statement found early in the book: "We cannot take for granted in this study that the Gospels' description of Jesus is historically accurate in all points" (p. 20). Presumably, the Modernists do not find it strange that they can take for granted "in this study" that Rationalism and Empiricism (both used in the process of Higher Criticism) can discover historically accurate proof - a logically fallacious enterprise. Rather than begin with the Truth of Revelation and deduce truths from there, they rather commit intellectual suicide through embracing the logically fallacious and cognitively vacuous process of rationalist and/or empiricist "historical accurate proof". Thus they prove the Scriptures correct as stated in Rom. 1:21-22 - that in their rejection of God's truth and in professing to be wise, they in actual fact become fools; exchanging the glory of God for the image of "god" they create through their historical and textual deconstruction. It would be much better for them to decontruct their own skepticism and humanism instead. ( )
  puritanreformed | Aug 10, 2009 |
Mostra 3 di 3
nessuna recensione | aggiungi una recensione
Devi effettuare l'accesso per contribuire alle Informazioni generali.
Per maggiori spiegazioni, vedi la pagina di aiuto delle informazioni generali.
Titolo canonico
Dati dalle informazioni generali inglesi. Modifica per tradurlo nella tua lingua.
Titolo originale
Titoli alternativi
Data della prima edizione
Personaggi
Dati dalle informazioni generali inglesi. Modifica per tradurlo nella tua lingua.
Luoghi significativi
Eventi significativi
Film correlati
Epigrafe
Dedica
Incipit
Citazioni
Ultime parole
Nota di disambiguazione
Redattore editoriale
Elogi
Lingua originale
DDC/MDS Canonico
LCC canonico

Risorse esterne che parlano di questo libro

Wikipedia in inglese

Nessuno

Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche

Descrizione del libro
Riassunto haiku

Discussioni correnti

Nessuno

Copertine popolari

Link rapidi

Voto

Media: (4.14)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3 2
3.5
4 2
4.5
5 3

Sei tu?

Diventa un autore di LibraryThing.

 

A proposito di | Contatto | LibraryThing.com | Privacy/Condizioni d'uso | Guida/FAQ | Blog | Negozio | APIs | TinyCat | Biblioteche di personaggi celebri | Recensori in anteprima | Informazioni generali | 203,241,905 libri! | Barra superiore: Sempre visibile