Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.
Sto caricando le informazioni... Hawksbill Station (1968)di Robert Silverberg
Nessuno Sto caricando le informazioni...
Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro. Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro. (...) Writing in the political climate of his Cold War age he doesn’t make clear choices : the “syndicalist” new government isn’t left nor right. The counter-revolutionaries seem to be modeled on the Russians, at least in name – some characters are described as “Khrushchevist with trotskyite leanings”, and similar denominations – but what they want doesn’t seem to be much more than reinstalling democracy. So don’t expect deep economical or political analysis – it seems as if Silverberg just picked the default revolutionary thought available to him at the time, and only used them as labels to add a bit of color, because that would be easily recognizable for his readers, and feel ‘contemporary’ too. While art and literature inherently don’t need to have political intentions, it is neigh impossible to escape ideological undercurrents. I think there is truth in Louis Althusser’s dictum “Ideology represents the imaginary relationship of individuals to their real conditions of existence”, and so that relationship unavoidably has an effect on writing too. As such, and especially given the subject matter of the book, it is a bit of a missed opportunity Silverberg didn’t try to communicate his political thoughts better, but I get it: he tried to write an entertaining book first – that house, you know. So a political manifest this not, even though it isn’t too bad as a short sociological sketch of a fictional case study. (...) Full review on Weighing A Pig Doesn't Fatten It Silverberg, Robert. Hawksbill Station. 1967. Berkley, 1978. This short novel has a simple premise: an authoritarian society gets rid of its malcontents by shipping them a billion years into the past when trilobites were the dominant lifeform. Food and other bare necessities are routinely shipped back to them. Since the camps are separated by gender and time, there is no chance to breed really early humans. But the novel is not really about time travel. It is about what it means to be a revolutionary and the kind of society a group of radicals would create if left on their own. Hawksbill is competently told, but the plot development reminds me too much of a Twilight Zone episode. 3.5 stars. The compassionate government of the future (actually set around now, but this was written many years ago) doesn't execute political prisoners any longer. Instead, they use a time machine to send them one billion years in the past to the Cambrian Era. The men sent here are led by Jim Barrett, a revolutionary who's been there the longest. There isn't much of anything for resources and the men are dependent on what the government sends them for the most part. The time machine is one-way; it can only send to the past so no one can return. Mr. Silverbert alternates between what's happening at the prison (Hawksbill Station) and what happened in Barrett's life. A new man has arrived who arouses some suspicion among the prisoners. I admit I didn't always understand the revolutionary sects and beliefs that are discussed in Barrett's reflections on his life, but I found some parallels to what actually happened during that time period. It's an interesting read that presages the author's future writings. A decent enough story, I found the flashbacks to the political past pretty dull stuff. The story is predictable once is gets going, but the flashbacks get more interesting towards the end too. Not his best by a long shot, but he still has a way with interesting characters, and I found the premise fascinating. I'd like to read the short story it started out as, for comparison. nessuna recensione | aggiungi una recensione
È contenuto inÈ una versione ampliata di
A "dark, restrained, and powerful" mirror of current politics from the Science Fiction Grand Master (Science Fiction Ruminations). In the barren landscape of the late Cambrian period, a penal colony sits high above the ocean on the east coast of what would become the United States. The men--political prisoners--have been sent from the twenty-first century on a one-way ticket to a lifetime of exile. Their lonely existence has taken its toll . . . Jim Barrett was once the physically imposing leader of an underground movement dedicated to toppling America's totalitarian government. Now he is nothing but a crippled old man, the camp's de facto ruler due to his seniority. His mind is still sharp, having yet to succumb to the psychosis that claims more and more men each day. So when a new prisoner is transported to the colony--a startlingly young and suspiciously apolitical man--Barrett's instincts go on high alert. As Barrett reminisces about his revolutionary past, he uncovers the new prisoner's secrets--and faces a shocking revelation that thrusts him into a future he never dreamed possible . . . "One of the finest writers ever to work in science fiction." --The Philadelphia Inquirer Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche |
Discussioni correntiNessunoCopertine popolari
Google Books — Sto caricando le informazioni... GeneriSistema Decimale Melvil (DDC)813.54Literature English (North America) American fiction 20th Century 1945-1999Classificazione LCVotoMedia:
Sei tu?Diventa un autore di LibraryThing. |
The story has two timelines: the characters’ current situation in the Cambrian, and their personal past lives, which took place in the 1980s to 2000s, called Up Front by the characters. I found the sections set in the 2000s to be tedious and silly, very much mired in the 1960s U.S. sociopolitical milieu that the novel was written in. We’re told that the Up Front government is repressive, fascist, evil, but we’re never shown it, or even told much of what they do that’s so evil. (They’ve cancelled elections, sure, but I’m coming round these days to the view that democracy is overrated anyway.)
The activists Up Front also exhibit the sexism of 60s political activists:
It was hard to understand or care about what motivated all the revolutionary fervor that landed them in exile. I could have done without all the backstory and would have preferred a focus on their current plight exiled in time. That in itself seemed like a gimmick (why not just lock them up, or send them to Antarctica or a desert island somewhere?), all just to lead us to the dénouement, which was for me the only really interesting part of the book. I understand this was an expansion of a short story. I suspect it would have been more successful if it had stayed that way.
I also had a problem with the mechanics of time travel in this novel.