between the masterful discussion of internet pornography/its consumption in this book and his work in "the feminist," incel studies departments of the future will be indebted to tulathimutte for decades, if not centuries -- this isn't "The Definitive Work Of Internet Fiction" but this could very, very conceivably be the person who writes it, provided tony's 2007 /gif/ tripcode isn't leaked before his next novel's NYT review is released

the rest of the book is a reasonably competent first novel by an MFA graduate with its requisite litany of quasi-developed ideas about postgraduate drift -- so, definitely read the work i discussed above and give the dude a follow, as i 100% believe there are great things yet to come. re: the rest of this book? idk you could read it if you wanted to but imho describing tech-adjacent 2010's culture is simultaneously too cartoonish and too strict in its realism to ever feel wholly satisfying in fiction -- you know the feeling you get when you see lisa simpson hold an iphone? it can't ever be "wrong" and it can't ever be "right" ( )

NO. Nope nope nope. I really wanted to like it. NYMag even touted it as the "First Great Millenial Novel" which, for as terrible a reputation that we as millenials have, I thought was still worthy of excitement. Maybe it would offer insight into why millenials seem worthy of antagonization, or more importantly, prove that we are really a lot like every generation that came before us.

The good part is that the four so-called millenials in this novel are not the reason to dislike it. They are, in general, selfish and unlikable but multifaceted in a way that may have been served with more skillful and focused narrative and writing. Did it challenge the way we are to view millenials? Absolutely not. It didn't NEED to, but it would have been nice for some analysis and synthesis regarding the four main characters. Two out of four of them go through a major change of character before the novel's end but unfortunately it felt unearned.

Here's my real issue, and I rarely feel this way: it honestly seemed as if Tulathimutte had his laptop in front of him and his thesaurus in his lap. I was looking up roughly 2-4 words per page, most of them so super specific that it was hard to justify the usage. At first, I thought that the style of writing was only specific to Linda, the hyper-literate ultra-defensive trouble addict. Then I noticed it had crept into all the other character's sections. Turns out that it's not just Linda who's yearning to be known as hyper-literate: It's Tulathimutte. He's proved it, just at the cost of the readability of his novel.

( )

A book about millenials in San Francisco. May be somewhat accurate, but nothing really happens, and the writing is very wordy. ( )

A novel speaking for, and reflecting, its generation. Wonderfully witty, self-aware, and smart. Sort of a cross between "Bright Lights, Big City" of the 1980s and Lena Dunham's 2000-ish "Girls." ( )

This book was chosen because it had good reviews and being older I like to delve into millennial's lives. This book loosely follows 4 Stanford students that came together in college and are now out in the hyper Bay Area. The writer is very creative and shows great knowledge but the book has way too many long narratives that show the writer's skill but add nothing to the book. Editing would have greatly helped. The characters seem caricatures unless there are really people like this. They were not very likable which is not a problem but it did make the book less interesting. They were definitely into themselves. I am really not clear why this book was so well received but it didn't work for me. ( )