First thing first, I don't think this book is for people completely unaware about Mongol history and the impact that they had over the present world as we know it.
I started this book as a complete noob in this area and it disappointed me to a great extent. The book is extremely haphazard in its subject matter in the initial few chapters. It seems as if the writer wants to tell everything about that incident in just a few lines (the past history of the incident, the present and how this incident will impact the future), and this makes the entire thing feel very rushed and confusing.However, as you continue (with a lot of patience) , you will get used to this style of writing. Whether this thing is because the research in this area is incomplete or unstructured or the writer wants to include everything at one go, I will never know.
However, at the same time ,you cannot say this book does not do justice to the Mongol history. It is unbiased and also has a few dedicated chapters on the present political scenario, which I think is really important to give us , readers , a perspective about the way of things.
I will advice people to pick up a different book in this subject matter. But you can also go for this book ,you won't be disappointed , just that you may have a bit of difficulty in the initial phases.
( )

Excellent, highly readable history of the Mongols. Focuses on Genghis through Kublai, mentions the outliers and notable descendents, then skips to the modern era. ( )

Author John Man takes us from the youth of Temujin, and how he became Genghis Khan and built an empire that crossed Asia into Europe, to his descendants - not just Ogedai and Kublai, but all the branches of his family, taking us into the internecine feuds and jostling for power while the empire Genghis has founded doubled in size, and then caused it to fracture and split.


He does a wonderful job of following the often tortuous paths of history with clarity, but also setting them in the context and feel of time and place; the attitudes of the lands and nations who faced the Mongols, well-argued reasons for why they fell or resisted. The canvas is vast, and he introduced me to many aspects of this history of which I was entirely unaware: the facts that the Turks were a earlier wave of settlers from the same part of the world, the Mongol conquest of the entirety of Asian Islam, the fact that European Christian crusaders allied with the Mongols on more than one occasion ( from a belief that they represented the mythical Eastern Christian emperor Prester John to simple practicality of fighting the same opponent ), the failed invasions of Vietnam and Japan, the off-hand remark that modern Pakistan was part of the empire. Each of these and more could fill volumes in their own right, and I hope I can find accounts written as well as this.


Not that this book is simply a brief overview, Man goes into detail that is substantial and in depth, but not overwhelming. Early on I had been perhaps a little disparaging of his narrative style, but that was entirely unfair; while quite different from the style of, say, Tom Holland, one of my personal favourites and a consummate writer of narrative histories. While initially it seems that Man is rushing through events and piling up detail, he circles back and suddenly he is building a narrative picture that has drawn the reader right into the heart of the story. His main achievement, though, is the way he connects the events to modern history, not only the China ( including how the Chinese claim Genghis for their own ) but Russia, the 'Stans, the Middle East and even how it moulded medieval Japan.


I do have to say that one problem with the book is the way he deals - or doesn't deal - with rape. This becomes especially apparent in a later section when he revisits the fact that one of Genghis' sons was viewed ( possibly correctly ) as illegitimate as his mother had been held captive by an enemy tribe for several months, as well as the fact of Y-chromosomes originating in Mongolia being widespread throughout Asia and Europe. He states these matters as simply that, without acknowledging the sexual violence implicit in both. I'm sure the author would say something along the lines of "it was a simple fact of how the world was then", but he doesn't say anything in the text and this omission, whether he feels it irrelevant, or is uncomfortable with the subject, leaves for me a troublesome gap that should at least have been recognised. ( )