Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.
Sto caricando le informazioni... Rethinking the ontological argument a neo-classical theistic responsedi Daniel A. Dombrowski
Nessuna etichetta Nessuno Sto caricando le informazioni...
Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro. Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro. Nessuna recensione nessuna recensione | aggiungi una recensione
In recent years, the ontological argument and theistic metaphysics have been criticised by philosophers working in both the analytic and continental traditions. Responses to these criticisms have primarily come from philosophers who make use of the traditional, and problematic, concept of God. In this 2006 volume, Daniel A. Dombrowski defends the ontological argument against its contemporary critics, but he does so by using a neoclassical or process concept of God, thereby strengthening the case for a contemporary theistic metaphysics. Relying on the thought of Charles Hartshorne, he builds on Hartshorne's crucial distinction between divine existence and divine actuality, which enables neoclassical defenders of the ontological argument to avoid the familiar criticism that the argument moves illegitimately from an abstract concept to concrete reality. His argument, thus, avoids the problems inherent in the traditional concept of God as static. Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche |
Discussioni correntiNessunoCopertine popolariNessuno
Google Books — Sto caricando le informazioni... GeneriSistema Decimale Melvil (DDC)212.1Religions Natural Theology and Secularism Pantheism and theosophy Existence/Nonexistence of GodClassificazione LCVotoMedia: Nessun voto.Sei tu?Diventa un autore di LibraryThing. |