Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.
Sto caricando le informazioni... Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campusesdi Richard Arum, Josipa Roksa
Nessuno Sto caricando le informazioni...
Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro. Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro. Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses is a detailed collection of statistics and cross references to additional research compiled by the authors. While the book contains 259 pages, the relevant information it presents is limited to the first 144 pages. The remainder is devoted to the bibliography and validation of the authors’ statistical analysis. The book can be summarized by three basic themes: Education is not equally available or of the same quality across socioeconomic lines. Students don’t want to study and want the easiest path to a degree. Educators promote this behavior because they don’t hold students to standards. The book offers that students today have high aspirations but simply no plans for reaching those goals. They are “adrift” not only academically but in their lives. They have no drive and expect a degree to be handed to them. Some of the statistics presented as backup were a bit startling. The average college student sends only 27 hours per week on all academic activities; going to class, studying and working on assignments. This is less time spent on academics than the typical high school student. However, this lack of effort isn’t reflected in their assessments as there has been little change in the average GPA of college students or graduation rates over the decades. Universities are simply handing out degrees to students that haven’t earned them. Both students and faculty are to blame. A number of student interviews are quoted in the book and show that students want to put in as little effort in their studies as possible and spend more time socializing and having fun. There is little incentive on the students’ part to work hard because educators don’t push them to perform. Some “ivy league” schools are noted as inflating grades so that the average GPA of their student population stays higher than average. This does a disservice to their students and could lead to a depreciation of the very brand image they are attempting to bolster. The majority of the book details the dire situation in which we find the educational system today. The last chapter does offer a few solutions. These include: better preparing students for academics prior to reaching college, pulling back on the notion that every student needs to go to college because some simply won’t be able to keep pace, holding higher education faculty to higher standards and improving curriculums to include more reading and writing which was shown to increase critical thinking skills. Great book to stir up questions, but the lack of a clear section on limitations and drawing graduation implications from a study of first and second year students is reason for some caution. With clearly stated limitations and well-grounded implications it would have received at least four stars and maybe five. This is a must read for any teacher -- or anyone who wants to comment on the state of education. Fixing our schools has absolutely nothing to do with privatizing them. (In fact, private schools oftentimes remove standards because they need customers who don't like doing the heavy lifting). Instead, we need to bring back rigor and standards to our classroom, demanding students put in the time and the work so they may think better!
Though ponderously stated (as is the whole book), the message again is that the university must be policed and regulated through outcomes testing.
Are undergraduates really learning anything once they get to college? The answer is no. As troubling as their findings are, the authors argue that for many faculty and administrators this conclusion will come as no surprise and is the expected result of a student body distracted by socializing or working and an institutional culture that puts undergraduate learning close to the bottom of the priority list. Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche |
Discussioni correntiNessunoCopertine popolari
Google Books — Sto caricando le informazioni... GeneriSistema Decimale Melvil (DDC)378.198Social sciences Education Higher education Organization and management; curriculumsClassificazione LCVotoMedia:
Sei tu?Diventa un autore di LibraryThing. |
I had assigned a visual self portrait, with a brief explanatory essay applying concepts from class. Most students elected to created photo collages. They identify the most important things in their lives to be their friends, their families, and their faith. Next were movies and video games they enjoy, and pets. When they wrote about or included images related to their university experience, it was about college friendships and parties, sorority life, or sports. None mentioned their major, and very few mentioned career goals or plans for the future, except for the desire to have a family. ( )