Fai clic su di un'immagine per andare a Google Ricerca Libri.
Sto caricando le informazioni... The Fasting Curedi Upton Sinclair
Nessuno Sto caricando le informazioni...
Iscriviti per consentire a LibraryThing di scoprire se ti piacerà questo libro. Attualmente non vi sono conversazioni su questo libro. The Fasting Cure is a reprint of two articles written by Upton Sinclair in 1910 for Cosmopolitan Magazine magazine about his personal experience and championing of fasting as a natural cure-all. Sinclair was exceedingly open-minded towards advances in holistic medicine - he was a customer and advocate of John Harvey Kellogg's infamous Battle Creek Sanitarium - not surprising for a man who also experimented with telepathy and even built his own whites-only socialist utopia (it burned down under mysterious circumstances after just one year). Far from a medical treatise, the majority of The Fasting Cure is comprised of Sinclair's anecdotal experiences experimenting with fasting as a cure for his own physical ailments, and success stories from people who successfully followed his example. In between the reader letters and Sinclair-centric testimonial he briefly tackles the "science" behind fasting as a cure-all in very basic terms - bacteria in the gut causes all forms of illness, apparently - with the occasional name-drop of medical pioneers like Kellogg. Slightly reminiscent of Aldous Huxley's experimentation with LSD, The Fasting Cure is a great example of how some of our greatest literary minds were shaped by their innovative and adventurous embrace of fringe ideas and theories. An interesting read, but you might want to seek medical advice from a physician before contemplating a sixty or ninety day fast to treat your colon cancer. nessuna recensione | aggiungi una recensione
New Age.
Nonfiction.
HTML: In May, 1910, Cosmopolitan magazine published an article by Upton Sinclair describing his personal experiences with the practice of fasting for health reasons. The article received such an enormous response that the magazine requested a second one. This volume is comprised of those two articles, and is a snapshot of the health beliefs of the era. .Non sono state trovate descrizioni di biblioteche |
Discussioni correntiNessunoCopertine popolari
Google Books — Sto caricando le informazioni... VotoMedia:
Sei tu?Diventa un autore di LibraryThing. |
"I believe that when the glad tidings of its miracles have reached the people it will lead to the throwing of 90 per cent of our present materia medica into the wastebasket." (Page 25)
We may have replaced 90% of the medical knowledge and practice in the 100 odd years since it was written, but another century will likely find another 90% change is medical belief and practice. There is still an awfully lot that we don't know.
"Following is the complete list of diseases benefited — 45 of the cases having been diagnosed by physicians: indigestion (usually associated with nervousness), 27; rheumatism, 5; colds, 8; tuberculosis, 4; constipation, 14; poor circulation, 3; headaches, 5; anemia, 3; scrofula, 1; bronchial trouble, 5; syphilis, 1; liver trouble, 5; general debility, 5; chills and fever, 1; blood poisoning, 1; ulcerated leg, 1; neurasthenia, 6; locomotor ataxia, 1; sciatica, 1; asthma, 2; excess of uric acid, 1; epilepsy, 1; pleurisy, 1; impaction of bowels, I; eczema, 2; catarrh, 6; appendicitis, 3; valvular disease of heart, 1; insomnia, 1; gas poisoning, 1; grippe, 1; cancer, 1." (Page 56)
For some of those diseases, I can imagine a mechanism by which fasting might effect a cure. For others? I recall that I was once acquainted with a David Taysum, a cancer researcher, who said if he ever got cancer he would totally eliminate vitamin C from his diet because cells, including cancer cells can't divide without vitamin C. He had conducted experiments upon mice (or was it rats), who lived to a normal life expectancy on the vitamin C free diet. He said he could recover from scurvy a lot of times. Perhaps scurvy would be less debilitating than chemotherapy. It would also be less expensive. For years I watched the literature to see if anyone else would advocate that tactic. I never saw a peep.
Some foods "should never be used, and that those who use them can never be as well as they would be without them. Such foods are all that contain alcohol or vinegar; all that contain cane sugar; all that contain white flour in any one of its thousand alluring forms of bread, crackers, pie, cake, and puddings; and all foods that have been fried — by which I mean cooked with grease, whether that grease be lard, or butter, or eggs or milk. It is my conviction that one should bar these things at the outset, and admit of no exceptions." (Page 75)
He went through a lot of diets, and found that what works for one person might not work for another. What worked for him at one time didn't work later on.
He experienced, and other people taking his advice experienced large weight swings both up and down. Current medical knowledge says that weight swings up and down are not healthy.
Many of the letters from people included in this book, learned of his recommendations from an article he wrote "Starving for Health's Sake," in the Cosmopolitan magazine probably early 1910. Another article of his was "The Truth about Fasting" in August 1910 Physical Culture. Both of those articles came out not long before this book was published in 1911. The book sold well. (That seems so similar to today's practice of authors making the rounds in magazine and podcasts drumming up support for their new book.)
It is interesting to read how differently disease was described 100 years ago, and especially the total lack of consensus on the proper treatment. Hmm, We don't have much consensus nowadays either. Although the words for common diseases are not the same, yet I notice that the approach of those who don't find conventional medicine satisfying, is much the same today as it was then. Perhaps the world hasn't change that much after all. ( )