2F

Should Kim tell Robert about Lee Darby?

No, there's no reason for her to tell him at this point. Kim is still able to investigate Darby whether Robert knows or not. If something changes and Kim thinks Robert needs to know, then she should tell him if Karen hasn't.

no - that's not her decision unless there's evidence that Lee's involved.

I did wonder though when we were getting some of Symes’ background if Lee Darby might be Will’s older brother and Symes’ friend. He was thinking about his friend going to jail and he said he had a good idea of who had tipped off the cops. I assume that he was turned in by the little brother that he beat and wondered if Symes’ teaming up with Will was a way to get payback for his friend.

>4 bhabeck: Oh...good thought. A family relationship and/or friendship was something I never though about. Telling Robert anything about Lee would serve no useful purpose and it's not Kim's place to say anything to him about it at all.

I don't think Robert needs to know anything about Lee. Kim should keep that confidential unless there's a serious reason to ruin three people's lives. Robert seems like a savvy guy who may already suspect something.

>4 bhabeck: >5 Carol420: Yes interesting idea. Hadn’t occurred to me.
>6 Olivermagnus: Agree that Robert may already suspect Karen’s secret.

Kim needs to say out of Karen's personal life in regards to who the father is of Charlie unless it becomes necessary by changes in the investigation.

I agree with you all that Kim should not drop this particular bombshell on Robert, it's none of her business.
Like Lynda, I wouldn't be surprised if Robert already knows or suspects, in any case.

I also agree. It’s not Kim’s place to tell him.

>4 bhabeck: Interesting idea.

Don’t think it would help the situation, and in fact make it a lot worse, if she told Robert! I wonder if Robert actually knows or suspects! >9 Sergeirocks:

No. This is a personal issue. It's not Kim's place to divulge this information.