Worst religious books

Descrizione
Worst books that purport to be revealed scripture, holy, etc. Which do you think is worse reading -- the Koran or the Bible or the Book of Mormon? Which do you think is more awful in its ethics? Have fun deciding.
1
100 utenti
1 recensione
2.8
3 Members
lquilter, inkcrow, waltzmn,
2
7,259 utenti
90 recensioni
3.2
3 Members
lquilter, aulsmith, waltzmn, ,
Spiegazioni
aulsmith: Very tedious
waltzmn: The Bible (both Hebrew and Greek portions) are written in the contemporary language of their people -- that is, contemporary Hebrew and Greek. If Joseph Smith was granted divine inspiration, why didn't God tell him to drop the fake King James English?
: I do see problems with its language and origins, but it also holds great value as a vehicle for inspiration. Some of its teachings are unfortunate, but others can be sublime and profound. In other words, it's a lot like many prized religious texts that wouldn't make the "Worst" list.
3
39 utenti
1 recensione
½ 1.5
2 Members
lquilter, inkcrow
4
22,417 utenti
397 recensioni
½ 3.7
5
309 utenti
2 recensioni
½ 3.7
Member
thorold
Spiegazioni
thorold: Isherwood is great. But not when he's in full guru-adoring mode
7
1,011 utenti
11 recensioni
4
2 Members
aulsmith, inkcrow,
Spiegazioni
aulsmith: Completely revolting ethics.
8
41 utenti
2 recensioni
3
Member
inkcrow
9
530 utenti
10 recensioni
½ 3.7
Member
lquilter
10
611 utenti
5 recensioni
½ 4.3
Member
aulsmith
Spiegazioni
aulsmith: Dull
11
50 utenti
1 recensione
0.8
Member
lquilter
12
164 utenti
1 recensione
½ 3.4
Member
aulsmith
Spiegazioni
aulsmith: Really dull and not very forthcoming if you don't know what adultery or the power of the keys is already.
13
672 utenti
15 recensioni
3.8
2 Members
lquilter, aulsmith, ,waltzmn ,
Spiegazioni
aulsmith: Repetitive, misogynist, dull and ethically questionable.
waltzmn : It is unfair to judge the Quran by English translations; although the Arabic is said to be brilliantly written, I have yet to see an English translation that is anything but wooden (usually so literal as to be meaningless). But I don't read Arabic. I will not condemn a book I cannot read.
14
498 utenti
19 recensioni
3.8
3 Members
lquilter, aulsmith, waltzmn, ,thorold , , ,
Spiegazioni
thorold : It might be a bad translation technically, but it's had a huge and generally positive influence on English literature
aulsmith: Bible in general: Too long, contradictory, misogynist and ethically queestionable. KJV: translation made from bad original sources
waltzmn: Without discussing the merits of the Bible as a religious work, the King James Translation is very poor as a translation (although an excellent piece of prose). The translators' Hebrew was poor, and although their Greek was better, they were translating an incredibly corrupt Greek text. Time to put the King James translation on the shelf as a literary monument and study a translation that is competent.
15
13,896 utenti
112 recensioni
4
Member
aulsmith,lquilter , ,thorold ,
Spiegazioni
aulsmith: Except for the part about Satan, it's dull.
16
17,480 utenti
171 recensioni
½ 3.7
Member
aulsmith, , ,thorold , ,
Spiegazioni
aulsmith: Dull and didactic.
17
18,510 utenti
218 recensioni
4.2
Spiegazioni
aulsmith : Short, snappy, a little obscure, but then it's not telling you stuff you can't find out by just living your life.