Irina Paperno
Autore di Suicide As a Cultural Institution in Dostoevsky's Russia
Sull'Autore
Irina Paperno teaches Russian literature and intellectual history at the University of California, Berkeley. Her publications include Suicide as a Cultural Institution in Dostoevsky's Russia, also from Cornell, and Chernyshevsky and the Age of Realism: A Study in the Semiotics of Behavior. She is mostra altro coeditor of several books, including Creating Life: The Aesthetic Utopia of Russian Modernism. mostra meno
Opere di Irina Paperno
Etichette
Informazioni generali
- Nome legale
- Паперно, Ирина Ароновна
Paperno, Irina Aronovna - Data di nascita
- 1952
- Sesso
- female
- Istruzione
- Tartu University (MA|Russian language and literature)
Stanford University (MA, PhD) - Organizzazioni
- University of California Berkeley
Utenti
Recensioni
Premi e riconoscimenti
Statistiche
- Opere
- 5
- Utenti
- 39
- Popolarità
- #376,657
- Voto
- 3.8
- Recensioni
- 2
- ISBN
- 13
Irina looks at how suicides in the 19th century Russia was discussed in newpapers and literary journals as a social and political phenomenon. The medical, judicial and religious views on suicide in this society are explained and she presents actual suicide notes published in the papers and how they were analyzed by the often anonymous writers of these articles. She then looks at suicide in literature and especially at Dostoevsky's use of suicide in his novels, as well as in his publicistic work. It is an extremely interesting work, which finishes with the bizarre true story of a writer of feuilletons who wrote on suicide in the journals, and started corresponding with Dostoevsky after, having been caught embezzling money from the bank he worked at for reasons that seem to mimic situations straight out of Dostoevsky's novels, tried to commit suicide and ended up in Siberia.
This book is not light reading, but if you are interested in semiotics of Russian 19th century culture, I highly recommend it. Irina Paperno's breadth and depth of research is astounding. My only quibble is that there is no separate bibliography, though everything is in the endnotes.… (altro)