T. M. Luhrmann
Autore di When God Talks Back: Understanding the American Evangelical Relationship with God
Sull'Autore
Tanya Marie Luhrmann is the Albert Ray Lang Professor at Stanford University, where she teaches anthropology and psychology. Her books include When God Talks Back: Understanding the American Evangelical Relationship with God.
Fonte dell'immagine: Stanford News Service
Opere di T. M. Luhrmann
Etichette
Informazioni generali
- Nome legale
- Luhrmann, Tanya Marie
- Data di nascita
- 1959-02-24
- Sesso
- female
- Nazionalità
- USA
- Luogo di residenza
- Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Cambridge, England, UK
San Diego, California, USA
Palo Alto, California, USA - Istruzione
- Harvard University (BA summa cum laude|Folklore and Anthropology|1981)
University of Cambridge (PhD|Anthropologiy|1986) - Attività lavorative
- anthropologist
university professor - Relazioni
- Luhrmann, Winifred (mother)
Dewdney, Anna (sister) - Organizzazioni
- Society for Psychological Anthropology
University of California, San Diego
University of Chicago
Stanford University - Premi e riconoscimenti
- AAA President's Award (2004)
Guggenheim Fellowship (2007)
American Academy of Arts and Sciences (Fellow ∙ 2003)
Phi Beta Kappa
Utenti
Recensioni
Premi e riconoscimenti
Potrebbero anche piacerti
Statistiche
- Opere
- 10
- Utenti
- 791
- Popolarità
- #32,200
- Voto
- 4.0
- Recensioni
- 16
- ISBN
- 22
- Lingue
- 1
Those who are not new to my reviews might be familiar with my stance on religion as a whole. I am a non-believer and I have been for around ten years or so. For every Clive Staples Lewis there exists a Christopher Hitchens, and this has affected how I consider certain aspects of belief. I was raised Roman Catholic which is not exactly known for having fun Church Services. It made me think of how bored God must be on his Throne in the sky, listening to the Choirs of Angels singing songs of praise. Who makes an entire race of beings just to be praised by those beings? The songs themselves are also boring, and mostly in minor keys, making them sound depressing. Also, the sacraments and pomp seemed stupid to me. Woohoo, I get to eat Christ and drink his blood.
As to why these people sound crazy, their stories about how they became believers are heart-warming and encouraging, but then you find out that they consult God about everything. I mean, Everything. What to wear, where to go to school, whether to have burgers or fish, it becomes ridiculous to me. Most of the study the author conducts is about whether or not these people are nuts. It is quite fascinating to read and quite quotable. My problem is with how evangelicals contact God in the first place. Obviously, it is through prayer. How else do you talk to a disembodied entity? Then you have to listen to the random static of your mind. Random thoughts that come to mind could be God talking to you, and he cares about everything you do. You’re just awash in the Spirit of God.
Now just because you think of something random or weird doesn’t mean it’s God talking to you. It could just be that the person is pretending. This means that they have to have some kind of standard for how to assess the veracity of God Messages. This makes sense, or else you could have someone say that God told them to go and kill people. This is a huge no-no since God wouldn’t do that.
Anyway, while the book was interesting at first, my attention began to flag around halfway through the book. Other than that, the book tells you how to tell different denominations apart from each other, the ideas shared by all evangelicals, and how an otherwise intelligent, discerning person can believe in a so-called Imaginary Friend. It is an attempt to bridge the gap between the believer and non-believer. I suppose it does a somewhat good job, especially since these people shared their private thoughts and feelings on something so personal.
… (altro)