Foto dell'autore

Marilyn Butler (1937–2014)

Autore di Romantics, Rebels and Reactionaries

9+ opere 313 membri 3 recensioni

Sull'Autore

Opere di Marilyn Butler

Opere correlate

Emma (1815) — Introduzione, alcune edizioni37,782 copie
Mansfield Park (1814) — Introduzione, alcune edizioni22,391 copie
L'abbazia di Northanger (1817) — A cura di, alcune edizioni21,521 copie
L'abbazia degli incubi (1818) — Introduzione, alcune edizioni432 copie
Castle Rackrent and Ennui (1993) — A cura di, alcune edizioni309 copie
Byron's Poetry and Prose [Norton Critical Edition] (2009) — Collaboratore — 94 copie
The Best Australian Essays 2001 (2001) — Collaboratore — 20 copie
Destination Tombstone: Adventures of a Prospector (1996) — Compiler, alcune edizioni7 copie

Etichette

Informazioni generali

Utenti

Recensioni

Wonderful history of the English romantics: Blake, Wordsworth, Coleridge, Austen, Scott, Byron, Shelley and Keats.
Romanticism has often been tagged revolutionary: its adherents boldly rejecting literary rules.
Butler argues that the real revolutionaries were the neo-classicists or primitivists of the preceding period: 1760-1790, when belief in freedom, progress and reform was widespread. The neo-classical style, championing noble simplicity, was identified (or at least associated) with political enlightenment.
According to Butler, Blake and Wordsworth (the Lyrical Ballads Wordsworth) were not romantic innovators. They were firmly attached to the tradition (alas, a recently new tradition) of neo-classicism and noble simplicity. What was so special about them wasn’t their content or their style, but the fact that they still employed it in the late 1790s. That is: after the big, fat counterrevolution that started in late 1792.
This is Butler’s second important point: neo-classicism and the revolutionary spirit where almost eliminated in the 1790s. After the fall of the bastille, the assassination of Louis 16 and the start of the english-french war, the english no longer favoured ideas of freedom and progress. In fact, the very idea of ‘ideas’ became suspicious, associated with radicals, anarchy, atheism.
Coleridge is a key example of this new zeitgeist: apolitical, anti-intellectual, very religious, attached to ‘old english’ values, retreated into a private world of melancholic personal feelings. Austen also belongs here: her books are a defense of ‘good old-fashioned’ gentry values. Scott is more bi-partisan, but still opposed to political reform (on the other hand he resembles the juste milieu-type exemplified by restoration-france politician Guizot).
Later on, in the 1810s, a new generation of literary radicals takes the stage: Shelley, Byron, Keats. Again, they link classicism’s clarity with the revolutionary cause. But they’re not so optimistic anymore. Ok, a better society may be eventually, but surely not in their lifetime. However their melancholy is not like Coleridge’s. Their private pessimism is concealed by a public embrace of comical satire, an ironic and detached commentary on society (Byron’s Beppo and Don Juan for instance). To them Coleridge seems a shady weakling, wallowing in german mysticism, an egoistic hermit.
I really love how Butler weaves together the literary, the personal and the political (and one hundred other factors). Her style is great: smooth, clear, fresh, to the point and sometimes a bit poetic. She’s a cool and razor-sharp observator of literary careers, but between the lines you feel her compassion with these small men caught up in history.
… (altro)
 
Segnalato
pingdjip | 1 altra recensione | Jun 20, 2008 |
Very illuminating on the political background to romanticism. You'll never look at Jane Austen the same way again!
 
Segnalato
lizw | 1 altra recensione | Nov 15, 2005 |

Premi e riconoscimenti

Potrebbero anche piacerti

Autori correlati

Statistiche

Opere
9
Opere correlate
8
Utenti
313
Popolarità
#75,401
Voto
3.9
Recensioni
3
ISBN
20

Grafici & Tabelle